Re: [Geotools-devel] Deadline for Annual Report

2009-03-03 Thread Michael Bedward
looking good Jody... as well as meeting the reporting requirement, such a summary is good for non-expert folks like me to see the bigger picture cheers Michael 2009/3/4 Jody Garnett : > Okay I have dug up last years report and placed it on  the wiki: > - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/

Re: [Geotools-devel] Deadline for Annual Report

2009-03-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Okay I have dug up last years report and placed it on the wiki:- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Annual+Report+2007 And have started filling in this years report: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Annual+Report+2008 I noticed that last year I mentioned contributors by name; I

[Geotools-devel] Deadline for Annual Report

2009-03-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Looks like we have a report due for OSGeo. As current representative this one will be my responsibility; I will compose my report on a wiki page and ask for review. Jody -- Forwarded message -- From: Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) Date: Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:51 AM Subject: Re: Deadline f

Re: [Geotools-devel] [jira] Resolved: (GEOT-1904) unsup/mappane has icons of unknown origin

2009-03-03 Thread Michael Bedward
Quick question about using JIRA... With the issue below, do I close this now or is it kept open for the released versions or what ? Please pardon my ignorance about the protocols Michael From: Michael Bedward (JIRA) Date: 2009/3/4 Subject: [jira] Resolved: (GEOT-1904) unsup/mappane has icons o

[Geotools-devel] Starting work on SEParser 1.1

2009-03-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Just a couple comments before I start work for the day ... > Ok, NOW I really understand what you're talking about! Fine then, I'll > copy SLDParser for v1.0 and call it SEParser for now (which in fact will > become a SLD+SEParser for v1.1). Later on, if we want, we can extract a > real SLDParser

[Geotools-devel] Rule and Symbolizer use of PropertyName or Expression

2009-03-03 Thread Jody Garnett
> > The negative feedback was based on intent of the change; which had some >> open unresolved issues (we do not know if it is possible with out some >> thinking). >> > > Not being standard was cited as one of the reasons against it. Read the > mail again. I am fine being a superset of the standa

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2365) ArcSDE createSchema fails

2009-03-03 Thread Jared Erickson (JIRA)
ArcSDE createSchema fails - Key: GEOT-2365 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2365 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Components: data arcsde Affects Versions: 2.5.3 Reporter: Jared Eri

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geotools-gt2-users] question from off list

2009-03-03 Thread Milton Jonathan
Andrea Aime wrote: > Milton Jonathan wrote: >> >> work) >> - That svg resource was used for a GraphicFill, but even after fixing >> the URL, the resulting fill was a plain grey one, ignoring the >> GraphicFill altogether > > That because you did not set the content type of the image, so th

Re: [Geotools-devel] ArcSDE bug fixes

2009-03-03 Thread Gabriel Roldán
Hey thanks for catching up those defects. As they're all related to the createSchema functionality I'd say please just create a single jira issue and attach a patch to it. TIA, Gabriel On Tuesday 03 March 2009 15:08:47 jericks wrote: > I was using the GeoTools ArcSDE extension to create a new f

[Geotools-devel] ArcSDE bug fixes

2009-03-03 Thread jericks
I was using the GeoTools ArcSDE extension to create a new feature class and then write features to it when I discovered a couple bugs. First, in the ArcSDE dummy api, the SeLayer object doesn't have a public void setGridSizes(int i, int j, int k) {} method (at least in 9.1 or 9.2). Removing thi

Re: [Geotools-devel] cascading WFS

2009-03-03 Thread Gabriel Roldán
Hi Tim, glad to see you've been making good progress on this, and also glad to hear you're interested in becomming a commiter for the wfs module. What you need to do to make that happen is to create a jira issue explaining the bug/improvement/whatever (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT) and

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geotools-gt2-users] question from off list

2009-03-03 Thread Andrea Aime
Milton Jonathan wrote: > work) > - That svg resource was used for a GraphicFill, but even after fixing > the URL, the resulting fill was a plain grey one, ignoring the > GraphicFill altogether That because you did not set the content type of the image, so the code cannot find a handler to load

Re: [Geotools-devel] EPSG authority connection handling patch

2009-03-03 Thread Andrea Aime
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Hello Andrea > > I had a quick look at the patch you posted at > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2363 and I'm fine with it. If you > have that change ready to commit on your local SVN, would you like to > commit them? Alternatively I can commit your patch if yo

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoApi change breaks the build?

2009-03-03 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett wrote: > The negative feedback was based on intent of the change; which had some > open unresolved issues (we do not know if it is possible with out some > thinking). Not being standard was cited as one of the reasons against it. Read the mail again. > Sounds like Andrea and I are

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geotools-gt2-users] question from off list

2009-03-03 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Jonathan Milton Jonathan a écrit : > Hmm, but it took me a little time to find it: it's > in geoapi 2.2, not 2.3 right? > http://geoapi.sourceforge.net/snapshot/javadoc/org/opengis/style/StyleFactory.html?is-external=true > (I guess 2.3 was split, I don't know if there are javadocs around f

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geotools-gt2-users] question from off list

2009-03-03 Thread Milton Jonathan
Hello again Ok, NOW I really understand what you're talking about! Fine then, I'll copy SLDParser for v1.0 and call it SEParser for now (which in fact will become a SLD+SEParser for v1.1). Later on, if we want, we can extract a real SLDParser v1.1 from that code. > I have a new StyleFactoryInter

[Geotools-devel] Representing XML idea of complex type extending simple type

2009-03-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > I think we missed coherence in our discussion... On my side I'm really fine > about Ben applying his change, and in my mind the "pending" module was > created > for that purpose. I replied to Ben on the mailing list saying than I'm fine > with > him applying the ch

Re: [Geotools-devel] EPSG authority connection handling patch

2009-03-03 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Andrea I had a quick look at the patch you posted at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2363 and I'm fine with it. If you have that change ready to commit on your local SVN, would you like to commit them? Alternatively I can commit your patch if you prefer - at your choice, just let m

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoApi change breaks the build?

2009-03-03 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Justin Deoliveira a écrit : > What bothers me more is how changes to geoapi have been handled > recently. In some cases ( like Ben's proposed changes ) it seems a > formal proposal is needed. However in the case of recent style changes > it seems breaking api is ok. It seems ambiguous to me. I

Re: [Geotools-devel] EPSG authority connection handling patch

2009-03-03 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Andrea Applying the patch sound fine them. Alternatively the timeout could also be put to a yet smaller value (e.g. 1 second) - at your choice. Martin -- Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-2

[Geotools-devel] JMapPane / JStreamXXXMap enhancements

2009-03-03 Thread fgdrf
hi, i'm currently using the JStream maps out of the package org.geotools.gui.swing.map.map2d.stream . But it's not easy to subclass because some of them are protected. What do you think, to make them public (see apended patch). cheers, Frank map2d.stream.handler.patch Description: Binary data