Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> following previous discussions on the mailing list
>> I've put togheter the following proposal:
>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Partial+3D+data+support
>>
>> Feedbacks and votes welcomed. Please review at your earlies
>> convenienc
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Hi,
>> quick mail to make some final checks on the modules
>> cleanup process.
>>
>> It seems to me all module re-assignments went well. Good!
>>
>> Moving wise, I think there was still on the place moving
>> the OGC EMF modules (unsupported/ogc
Andrea Aime wrote:
> following previous discussions on the mailing list
> I've put togheter the following proposal:
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Partial+3D+data+support
>
> Feedbacks and votes welcomed. Please review at your earlies
> convenience.
+1. This looks like a definite imp
Many thanks for this Andrea.
+0 from me: I wholeheartedly support the intention of the proposal but
I don't feel sufficiently qualified to assess the technical issues
that you and Jody discussed
Michael
--
Crystal Report
Oracle 11g Spatial DB Connection
Key: GEOT-2541
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2541
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Wish
Affects Versions: 2.5.4
Environment: Eclipse 3.4 Ganymede
Oracle 11g Spatial DB Connection
Key: GEOT-2540
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2540
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Wish
Affects Versions: 2.5.4
Environment: Eclipse 3.4 Ganymede
Daniele Romagnoli wrote:
> Hi lists,
> I have noticed that both geotools trunk and geoserver 1.7.x has an
> OpenGeo repository items in the repository list (having SNAPSHOTS tag
> enabled) whilst geotoools 2.5.x doesn't.
> 2.5.x only contains the Osgeo repo.
> [http://svn.osgeo.org/geotools/bran
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> quick mail to make some final checks on the modules
> cleanup process.
>
> It seems to me all module re-assignments went well. Good!
>
> Moving wise, I think there was still on the place moving
> the OGC EMF modules (unsupported/ogc) to supported land.
> Justin? What wi
Log to finer level when converters do fail with an exception
Key: GEOT-2539
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2539
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
Compo
Not from here.
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Owner - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob:+39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
ht
Hi all,
as usual in order to release GeoServer 1.7.5 we need to cut a
GeoTools release as well. I would like to do so tomorrow.
Any last minute change you need to include in the release?
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
-
Hello Jody,
Thank you for looking at this again. I managed to provide a workaround for my
problem, so I closed the issue on JIRA.
If this is needed in the future, it can be raised again (and fixed properly). I
do agree that multiplicity has to be considered and it needs a lot of
thought...
Ch
GEOT-2073 fix intoduced severere performance degradation due to open SUN Bug
ID:6568969
Key: GEOT-2538
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2538
Project: G
Hi all,
following previous discussions on the mailing list
I've put togheter the following proposal:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Partial+3D+data+support
Feedbacks and votes welcomed. Please review at your earlies
convenience.
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.o
Add partial 3d support to GeoTools
--
Key: GEOT-2537
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2537
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: core geometry, core main, core render, data
Hi lists,
I have noticed that both geotools trunk and geoserver 1.7.x has an OpenGeo
repository items in the repository list (having SNAPSHOTS tag enabled)
whilst geotoools 2.5.x doesn't.
2.5.x only contains the Osgeo repo. [
http://svn.osgeo.org/geotools/branches/2.5.x/pom.xml]
Should we add OpenG
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Hi Andrea:
>
> Thanks for running this one along - some comments inline.
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
>> I asked around, nobody is interested in making even light
>> maintenance on mif, geomedia, gml, gml3 and vpf.
>>
>> Yet, Camp2Camp confi
17 matches
Mail list logo
