Re: [Geotools-devel] Vote on RFC "Next generation resource persistence in uDig"

I gave it a +1 as well On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Okay ran through the page: > > * > http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/Common+Data+Objects+resource+persistence > * Renamed it to be specific (ie the change is the use of CDO rather than > EMF for persis

[Geotools-devel] Dissolve Process

Hi Levi: Here is the email I was referring to with respect to "dissolve"... Andrea wrote:: > Dear all, > > I created a feature collection adding features from different layers > (~append). By the way, I would like now to process a geometry UNION > according to one attribute which actually can be

Re: [Geotools-devel] Vote on RFC "Next generation resource persistence in uDig"

Okay ran through the page: * http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/Common+Data+Objects+resource+persistence * Renamed it to be specific (ie the change is the use of CDO rather than EMF for persistence) * Changed the target to 1.3.0 (rather than uDig 2.0) * Broke up some of the tasks

Re: [Geotools-devel] FeatureVersioning interface api

I have put up a new UML that reflects Andrea's naming changes and Jody's request not to have a locking dependency. http://imgur.com/83RdW.png -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configu

[Geotools-devel] WFS 2.0 Filter Encoding and the VersionedFeatureSource interface

Hey Devs, I had a read through of the OGC Filter Encoding specification to see how it matches up with the VersioningFeatureSource proposed interface. It does mesh fairly well. The use a ResourceId which is an undefined string. There are actions for getting all versions using FilterActions: "The v

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy wrote: > Note that the open FileGDB API have several limitations which ArcObjects > does not have: > > FileGDB API only supports file geodatabases from release 10 or later > Spatial queries is limited to the envelope-intersects operator > It doe

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

Note that the open FileGDB API have several limitations which ArcObjects does not have: - FileGDB API only supports file geodatabases from release 10 or later - Spatial queries is limited to the envelope-intersects operator - It does not (yet) support rasters (see the documentation bundl

Re: [Geotools-devel] Vote on RFC "Next generation resource persistence in uDig"

Hi again! Sorry for the cross-list posting. This should have been on the udig-devel list :-) Cheers, Kenneth 2011/8/8 Kenneth Gulbrandsoy > Hi PMC! > > The "Next generation resource persistence in uDig" > RFC

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

Comments below. 2011/8/8 Andrea Aime > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy > wrote: > > Hi Justin! > > Good tip! Comments below. > > 2011/8/8 Justin Deoliveira > >> > >> Just a note that fgdb support was recently added to ogr as a format... > so > >> using the existing ogr data

[Geotools-devel] Vote on RFC "Next generation resource persistence in uDig"

Hi PMC! The "Next generation resource persistence in uDig" RFC is now ready to receive votes from members of the PMC (and committers). I would like to get starting as soon as possible on this. It wou

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy wrote: > Hi Justin! > Good tip! Comments below. > 2011/8/8 Justin Deoliveira >> >> Just a note that fgdb support was recently added to ogr as a format... so >> using the existing ogr datastore (and its java bindings for ogr) could be an >> easie

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

Hi Justin! Good tip! Comments below. 2011/8/8 Justin Deoliveira > Just a note that fgdb support was recently added to ogr as a format... so > using the existing ogr datastore (and its java bindings for ogr) could be an > easier route to go. However it requires ogr >= 1.9.0. According to the d

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

Hi Landon! I'll wait on any feedback from OJ programmers before we proceed then. Cheers, Kenneth 2011/8/8 Sunburned Surveyor > Thanks for all the feedback on this topic. It sounds like there has > already been some tentative work done in the File geodatabase area by > GeoTools developers, even

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

Thanks for all the feedback on this topic. It sounds like there has already been some tentative work done in the File geodatabase area by GeoTools developers, even if it isn't in an official capacity. I must admit I know very little about file geodatabases. One of our more talented OpenJUMP progra

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

Just a note that fgdb support was recently added to ogr as a format... so using the existing ogr datastore (and its java bindings for ogr) could be an easier route to go. However it requires ogr >= 1.9.0. On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy < [email protected]> wrote:

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

Hi Landon! I refer to previous posts in this thread. We could start a "joint venture" where we both are module maintainers. I have looked into adding the free file geodatabase format, which does not have any public Java API yet.

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

I'll do that. Thanks :-) Kenneth 2011/8/8 Jody Garnett > +1 on my end; it would be nice if you can ask Landon if he wants to be > listed as module maintainer as well (he already has commit access from a > while back). > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On Monday, 8 August 2011 at 11:09 PM, Kenneth Gulb

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

+1 on my end; it would be nice if you can ask Landon if he wants to be listed as module maintainer as well (he already has commit access from a while back). -- Jody Garnett On Monday, 8 August 2011 at 11:09 PM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy wrote: > Hi list! > > I could add my work on a FGDB as an u

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

Hi list! I could add my work on a FGDB as an unsupported module. This modules requires arcobjects.jar on the classpath, which is only available if you have access to least an ArcGIS Engine Runtime license (commersial licence that you have to pay a lot of money for). But the code is sound I belie

Re: [Geotools-devel] comments on new docs pages

> Hi Jody, > > Fantastic to see the docs so "agile" :) Very much appreciated. Well I kind of cheated; I rescued the content from our developers guide so it could be more agile. (I did also update the developers guide; and assigned a bunch of stuff to Ben for review - thanks Ben). > Here are a

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

Comments below. 2011/8/8 Andrea Aime > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Andrea Aime > wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> ESRI have made a c library available. You could wrap that with JNA. > > > > This thread is kinda scary: > > > > > http://forums.arcgis.com

[Geotools-devel] comments on new docs pages

Hi Jody, Fantastic to see the docs so "agile" :) Very much appreciated. Here are a few more comments on the new pages: 1. source page: the demo dir is listed but has been removed from trunk 2. maven/build page: is the note about the javadoc jar still current ? I thought we fixed that. 3. mave

Re: [Geotools-devel] FeatureVersioning interface api

Hello Walter and welcome to the geotools dev list. On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Walter Deane wrote: > Hey gabriel, > > I had a discussion with you a week ago about your GeoGIT project. We have > been having a discussion on the list about a proposal for a > VersioningFeatureStore interface that

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

Comments below. 2011/8/8 Jody Garnett > That is nifty. So did you work directly against the esri jars then? > Yes. But when I tried to run it on Ubuntu 64 bit I struck some major problems (not on the list of supported linux versions). I ran out of time and had to suspend the project in favor

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

That is nifty. So did you work directly against the esri jars then? If there is actually a will to collaborate on this one then perhaps you could set it up as an unsupported module? -- Jody Garnett On Monday, 8 August 2011 at 7:27 PM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy wrote: > Hi! > > I have done a lot

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

Hi! I have done a lot of this work on a private branch of GeoTools, by porting the org.geotools.arcsde plugin to supporting FGDBs. I have managed to port most of it, keeping the same structure and API as the arcsde plugin. The work was so laborious (especially the filter mapping), that I did no

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

Wonder if wine would let you run it? -- Jody Garnett On Monday, 8 August 2011 at 5:37 PM, Michael Bedward wrote: > On 8 August 2011 17:22, Andrea Aime (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > However there is no OSX support it seems (see attached screenshot). > > > > One also has

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

On 8 August 2011 17:22, Andrea Aime wrote: > However there is no OSX support it seems (see attached screenshot). > > One also has to accept a rather lenghtly contract before reaching the download > page P (sound of my enthusiasm rapidly deflating) Michael --

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: >> ESRI have made a c library available. You could wrap that with JNA. > > This thread is kinda scary: > > http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/3-Cross-plattform-API?highlight=linux > > No pl

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

I don't think anyone doubts the value; just the funding. We also don't have the best record of two-way collaboration with OpenJUMP. There is also a java api; if you were willing to do the same dummy jar approach currently employed for arcsde. Make a jar with stub methods so we can compile the

Re: [Geotools-devel] FGDB Support in GeoTools?

On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > ESRI have made a c library available. You could wrap that with JNA. This thread is kinda scary: http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/3-Cross-plattform-API?highlight=linux No plans for 64bit linux? So they want to make sure no server product

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3776) stroke-dasharray from database

stroke-dasharray from database -- Key: GEOT-3776 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3776 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Components: render Affects Versions: 2.7.2 Repor

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3775) problem with mark size

problem with mark size -- Key: GEOT-3775 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3775 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Tobias Warneke GeoTools only take into account the height of my dy