Requested:
Forwarded Message
Subject: Feature request: Squash and merge author option
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:27:24 +1200
From: Ben Caradoc-Davies
To: GitHub Support
"Squash and merge" loses authorship information. To preserve the moral
right of attribution, it would be grea
Attribution is a moral right distinct from copyright. We have an
obligation to attribute the work of individuals, even when their
copyright has been assigned, and even when their commits are messy.
On one occasion I took pity on a good fix made of messy commits,
squashed them locally, and set -
I am still interested in getting VT into an extension for 4.10.
I need to do;
a) a review of the code, run auto-formatting, verify (c) headers
b) Port over the Suite 4.8 documentation to Geoserver documentation, link
in the 2 presentations that Andreas and I did at Foss4G.
c) make sure the OL3 VT
If the original author provided a clean pull request with the correct
commits he deserves a merge, otherwise a squash by the administrator
maybe appropriate.
On 08/31/2016 11:16 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi,
just tried a couple of merges like that and I'm not liking one bit
about it... the commi
Hi,
just tried a couple of merges like that and I'm not liking one bit about
it... the commit looks like it's done
by the merger, not the original author. I don't think this is fair, unless
whoever is merging is also the author
of the pull request
Cheers
Andrea
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 7:42 PM, J
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Frank Gasdorf wrote:
> Thanks a ton, you saved my Day!
>
> I enabled advanced rendering option in uDig's BasicFeatureRenderer:
>
> rendererHints.put(StreamingRenderer.ADVANCED_PROJECTION_HANDLING_KEY,
> true);
>
> and it works like a charm even with the older GT-
