[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-master-online-geopackage #16

See -- Started by timer Building in workspace > git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout

Re: [Geotools-devel] One liner proposal: adding a reloadFeatureType(Name) method to DataStore to clear eventual caches attached to a certain feature type

Think I would prefer Datastore.flush( featureTypeName ) - since this does more than just clear the schema, the ContentEntry / ContentState can store cached values for bounds, etc... -- Jody Garnett On 8 November 2016 at 02:14, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > on the GeoServer devel list we have been

Re: [Geotools-devel] jts use of Shapefile Reader

dual license: EPL / BSD donating/relicense same story, different workflow: donating = here jts you can update the headers for those files you have our permission relicense = here jts I released the files with updated headers for you, go ahead and copy into your project -- Jody Garnett On 8 Novem

Re: [Geotools-devel] jts use of Shapefile Reader

+1 to approve relicensing (to EPL 1.0 if I recall correctly?). Is there a distinction between relicensing and donating? I think you are asking for the former. Donating might mean more paperwork. Kind regards, Ben. On 09/11/16 07:49, Jody Garnett wrote: > Got a request from working with Martin o

[Geotools-devel] jts use of Shapefile Reader

Got a request from working with Martin on the next JTS release: As part of relicensing JTS we are hunting down where external contributions came from, one such is "ShapefileReader" from an early GeoTools 2 release (before the switch to the file io api). Can I ask for PSC approval to send an email

Re: [Geotools-devel] One liner proposal: adding a reloadFeatureType(Name) method to DataStore to clear eventual caches attached to a certain feature type

Hi Justin, that's funny, the first version of the mail I wrote had "flush" everywhere, and I then renamed it to have reload to match a comment Ben made on the GeoServer thread (but he was commenting on the REST API, I was probably quick to make a parallel between two things that are seen in differe

Re: [Geotools-devel] One liner proposal: adding a reloadFeatureType(Name) method to DataStore to clear eventual caches attached to a certain feature type

Sounds like a good idea to me. I do have a comment on naming though (surprise). To me calling it “reloadFeatureType” implies that it will be reloaded immediately and is perhaps confusing/misleading? Using a verb like “flush” or “clear” might be more suitable to it’s actually purpose. $0.02 On Tue

Re: [Geotools-devel] One liner proposal: adding a reloadFeatureType(Name) method to DataStore to clear eventual caches attached to a certain feature type

sounds reasonable to me Ian On 8 November 2016 at 10:14, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > on the GeoServer devel list we have been discussing the ability to clear a > feature type cache in ContentDataStore with > minimal disruption to other ongoing activities: > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Ex

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5568) Deadlock on schema parsing

Title: Message Title Andreas W created an

[Geotools-devel] One liner proposal: adding a reloadFeatureType(Name) method to DataStore to clear eventual caches attached to a certain feature type

Hi, on the GeoServer devel list we have been discussing the ability to clear a feature type cache in ContentDataStore with minimal disruption to other ongoing activities: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Exposing-the-ability-to-reload-a-feature-type-in-the-REST-API-td5294306.html Now, the solut