Ben Caradoc-Davies a écrit :
> That would be great! It may also be necessary to exchange source in both
> directions, so I encourage both the geotools and geotoolkit communities
> to endeavour to keep their licensing compatible.
Yes, the license is the same (LGPL 2.1) and the copyright owner the
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> All the above modules, including coverage, will be developped in geotoolkit
> in
> the future. GeoTools may choose to replace some of their modules by
> dependencies
> to geotoolkit if they wish.
That would be great! It may also be necessary to exchange source in b
Hello Ben
Ben Caradoc-Davies a écrit :
> Martin, are there any other Jira components to be handed over?
There is the also the referencing, metadata, widgets-swing, coverageio,
coverageio-netcdf, coverageio-hdf, openoffice, epsg-hsql and epsg-extension
modules. There is 106 JIRA tasks that are s
Given the recent evolution, I think that you are suggestion sounds
reasonable. So, yeah, jody, you can change the default assignment.
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Owner - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camai
I will remove the default assignment.
Jody
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
wrote:
> I noticed when submitting an issue that Martin Desruisseaux is still the
> default assignee (component lead) for the GeoTools Jira coverage module.
> As Martin is emigrating to geowebkit, we nee
I noticed when submitting an issue that Martin Desruisseaux is still the
default assignee (component lead) for the GeoTools Jira coverage module.
As Martin is emigrating to geowebkit, we need a replacement.
I nominate Simone, for most recently breaking it. :->
Simone, you are the most-assigned
