Clint Lewis ha scritto:
> Well as I have said I changed it to 2.2.0 and all looks well I have
> reported a bug and in JIRA... but that is another issue
>
>
Clint,
we are going to need 2.2.1-snapshot anyway because of the SVG rendering
bugfix that did
not make into 2.2.0 (SVG icons not being re
Cory Horner wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
>
>> Just following instructions, I know that every release that gets put out
>> of geotools 2.2.x, i am forced to update the version of geotools
>> referenced by geoserver. If the udig team has a magic 2.2.x going down,
>> please tell me about it.
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>Just following instructions, I know that every release that gets put out
>of geotools 2.2.x, i am forced to update the version of geotools
>referenced by geoserver. If the udig team has a magic 2.2.x going down,
>please tell me about it.
>
>
uDig also updates the versio
On Mon, 2006-14-08 at 18:18 +0200, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> > Just following instructions, I know that every release that gets put out
> > of geotools 2.2.x, i am forced to update the version of geotools
> > referenced by geoserver.
> Um, indeed? So when we put out a version
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Just following instructions, I know that every release that gets put out
> of geotools 2.2.x, i am forced to update the version of geotools
> referenced by geoserver.
Um, indeed? So when we put out a version it gets a number: 2.2.0, 2.2.1,
2.2.3. The branch is not "out"
Well as I have said I changed it to 2.2.0 and all looks well I have
reported a bug and in JIRA... but that is another issue
Kind Regards
Clint Lewis
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Just following instructions, I know that every release that gets put out
> of geotools 2.2.x, i am forced to update th
Just following instructions, I know that every release that gets put out
of geotools 2.2.x, i am forced to update the version of geotools
referenced by geoserver. If the udig team has a magic 2.2.x going down,
please tell me about it.
-Justin
Jody Garnett wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>> How
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> How long have you been building against this version. Is it
> 2.2.x-SNAPSHOT or 2.2.x? I know had the same problem with geoserver but
> had to suck it up and keep up with version changes on the branch.
>
I think uDig was also targeting 2.2.x (aka the branch). I am not
How long have you been building against this version. Is it
2.2.x-SNAPSHOT or 2.2.x? I know had the same problem with geoserver but
had to suck it up and keep up with version changes on the branch.
-Justin
Clint Lewis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are running our application against version 2.2.x and ther
Hi,
We are running our application against version 2.2.x and there was a
version change to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT and this causes a problem since our
application now will not get the latest code released.
We expected the branch version to remain at 2.2.x but it was changed to
2.2.1-SNAPSHOT.
In the s
10 matches
Mail list logo
