Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2.6-RC1

Hey Justin: I am also going to try for another uDig milestone this week so I am keen for a GeoTools release of some sort. We are running pretty hard into jdbc-ng differences: - GEOT-2325 - GEOT-2664 I am not sure about the feature model discussion with Ben; it seems like he got distracted

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2.6-RC1

Cool. I am working on committing GEOT-2325 as we speak. Jody Garnett wrote: > Hey Justin: > > I am also going to try for another uDig milestone this week so I am keen > for a GeoTools release of some sort. > > We are running pretty hard into jdbc-ng differences: > - GEOT-2325

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2.6-RC1

Hmmm... ok. That is sort of a big bill though. And at the time of looking I saw no mention of another milestone in jira, makes release planning in GeoServer hard if we want to stick to actual GeoTools releases. Given the scope of this work and that we want to release GS this week I am seeing a

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2.6-RC1

Given the amount of changes I was going to release another milestone release. I am waiting to hear back on: - feature model discussion with Ben - do we need a new method to mark an attribute inline? If so we need to march up a couple geoapi versions and make the change. I was hoping to get t

[Geotools-devel] geotools 2.6-RC1

Hi all, How do folks feel about releasing gt 2.6-RC1 next week? Looking in jira there are no blockers. A few high priority issues: * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2154 Change to new Filter API made the "old" use of FidFilter very inefficient * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1192 M