Re: [Geotools-devel] Replace JScience JSR275 with JSR363

Hi, It is my intention to provide GWS/GS pull requests if needed, obviously I'll be happy if someone wants to help on it. For the moment I'm going to work on a PR for Geotools, then I'll evaluate how painful it was and what is needed for GWC/GS. Best regards, César On 19 March 2018 at 16:05,

Re: [Geotools-devel] Replace JScience JSR275 with JSR363

Hi Jody, looks good, will you also have corresponding GWC/GS pull requests (if at all needed, of course)? Cheers Andrea On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > We have been working today and have made the following proposal: > -

Re: [Geotools-devel] Replace JScience JSR275 with JSR363

We have been working today and have made the following proposal: - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Migrate-Units-to-JSR-363 So far no surprises, we will be in tomorrows GeoTools meeting if there are any questions, and would like to proceed with a pull request this week. -- Jody Garnett

Re: [Geotools-devel] Replace JScience JSR275 with JSR363

Thanks Andrea and Jody for your very kind offers. I will be at the Bonn code sprint. I've committed to work on some other tasks, but I think I could keep some time (maybe a day?) for pushing this task. In any case, I'll try to advance some work before the code sprint. I think I will start by

Re: [Geotools-devel] Replace JScience JSR275 with JSR363

Caradoc-Davies [mailto:b...@transient.nz] Gesendet: Freitag, 11. August 2017 00:03 An: Jens Auer Cc: 'GeoTools Developers' Betreff: Re: [Geotools-devel] Replace JScience JSR275 with JSR363 Jens, the master build passes for me with Maven 3.5.0 and OpenJDK 8u141 on debian/sid. That is, I cannot

Re: [Geotools-devel] Replace JScience JSR275 with JSR363

ff: Re: [Geotools-devel] Replace JScience JSR275 with JSR363 That would be an amazing pull request Jens; we have a code freeze coming up in only a couple of weeks - how difficult do you think the migration would be? I am happy to help prep a change proposal to see this go ahead; the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Replace JScience JSR275 with JSR363

ols Developers Betreff: Re: [Geotools-devel] Replace JScience JSR275 with JSR363 That would be an amazing pull request Jens; we have a code freeze coming up in only a couple of weeks - how difficult do you think the migration would be? I am happy to help prep a change proposal to see this

Re: [Geotools-devel] Replace JScience JSR275 with JSR363

That would be an amazing pull request Jens; we have a code freeze coming up in only a couple of weeks - how difficult do you think the migration would be? I am happy to help prep a change proposal to see this go ahead; the jar we use for JSR275 is rather unofficial (published by the JScience