On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 21:36 +0100, Philip Gardner wrote:
Please don't drop get_iplayer! I use Web PVR Manager all the time,
and find it invaluable.
But still it's something that should work generically with
get_flash_videos, not be incestuously integrated as it is in
get_iplayer.
--
dwmw2
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 17:37 -0700, CHRIS wrote:
wanker
-Original Message-
From: get_iplayer-boun...@lists.infradead.org
[mailto:get_iplayer-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of
get_iplayer-ow...@lists.infradead.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 2:02 PM
To:
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 14:25 +, Roger Burton West wrote:
When I look at http://www.bbc.co.uk/mobile/iplayer/episode/b00vn7gx
(with a suitable iPhone-ish user-agent set, otherwise I just get the
unsupported message) there's no download.iplayer.bbc.co.uk URL in the
response.
Aren't they
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 13:15 +, fs ck wrote:
I found that many of the programs in the channel 'BBC HD' were also on
other channels. Subsequently a search using --channel=hd only showed a
subset of HD programs.
This patch works around this by adding 'HD' to the category list for
all
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 15:30 +, Andy Bircumshaw wrote:
On 17/12/2010, at 2:30pm, Arthur Dent wrote:
...
Is there anything that can be done about the slightly irritating Using
a hash as a reference is deprecated warnings?
Yes, upgrade to the git release. This was fixed 2 months ago.
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:55 +, Andy Bircumshaw wrote:
I can only imagine that the GUI might be, for you, a big mess of
colours which don't really make sense, and trying to use it like
blundering around in a very strange place. I can only imagine buttons
and checkboxes and scrollbars as
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:50 +, Robin Bowes wrote:
Did you consider hosting on github? It makes it trivial to clone a
tree and merge changes between trees.
I don't particularly want to use third party services for my own
hosting, but I don't think that stops *you* from using github.
You
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 00:17 +, Andy Bircumshaw wrote:
Ok. So is there any good reason not to make this (or --swfAge=1 -
cache for 24 hours) a get_iplayer default?
Yes. It's a crappy workaround for a bug in rtmpdump. Just fix rtmpdump
instead.
--
dwmw2
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 11:41 +, Kevin Reilly wrote:
On 09/01/2011 00:28, David Woodhouse wrote:
Yes. It's a crappy workaround for a bug in rtmpdump. Just fix rtmpdump
instead.
Ah, but we Windows users care not for such distinctions. We just keep
piling on the crappy workarounds until
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 16:08 +, Andy Bircumshaw wrote:
Or alternatively just reinstall get_iplayer. Surely the current
Windows installer provides 2.3 ?
No, it still installs 2.2d. It's not as easy under Windows to handle
software packaging and dependencies. An update to the installer
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 23:09 +, fs ck wrote:
This looks good except I cannot find it as a package in ubuntu and
some other distros for Linux.
That can be fixed.
--
dwmw2
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
Various fixes to keep up with the current service...
Andy Bircumshaw (1):
Show title correctly in terminal or tmux
David Woodhouse (14):
Restore Phil's NSIS installer improvements
There is no 'rtmpdump' option; it's 'flvstreamer' still
Remove unneeded files
Install
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 19:06 +, Paul wrote:
Thanks for the new release which is working nicely for both Radio and
TV, though I admit the only command I ever use is 'get_iplayer --pid '
I have also downloaded flvstreamer_win32_latest and rtmpdump 2.3, and
amended the options to
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 12:18 +, J K.Eason wrote:
You don't need to change it if you just replace the executable in the
original folder (at least under Windows).
True. If you place the rtmpdump 2.3 executable in the rtmpdump-2.2d/
directory, then you don't need to change the options file.
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 13:27 +, Robin Bowes wrote:
Yes - yo61.com is hosted on Google Apps. I wonder why it does that
though - most annoying!
You should report it as a bug.
Some people have very strange and broken ideas about email; in
particular the idea that mail from you should only come
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 13:39 +, Robin Bowes wrote:
On 10/01/11 13:33, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 13:27 +, Robin Bowes wrote:
Yes - yo61.com is hosted on Google Apps. I wonder why it does that
though - most annoying!
You should report it as a bug.
Some
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 17:45 +, Robin Bowes wrote:
PS. Another annoying problem is that I'm not seeing my replies to the
list, ie. I can se my reply in the archive, and I see the replies to my
reply, but my actually reply does not drop in my inbox. I've checked my
mailman settings and it
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 23:07 +, Graham Cobb wrote:
You are right -- flvstreamer has the same problem so I am back to
rtmpdump and crossing my fingers!
You *could* try detecting it and deleting the partially-downloaded file.
Not sure what happens if you remove --resume from the rtmpdump
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 07:10 +, Ranec wrote:
Does *anyone* on the list have experience in making the Windows
installer?
Not useful experience, no. There is apparently some way to run
Strawberry Perl as a 'compiler' to make it spit out just the files you
need, as dependencies for the
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Some mail clients, usually the ones written with lists in mind, have a
shortcut to reply only to the list. In mutt it's Shift-L.
Although many people frown upon that feature and consider it extremely
rude to drop people from the discussion by
On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 17:01 +0100, Andy Waddington (software devel)
wrote:
Sometime before sending, David Woodhouse typed (and on Saturday 2011-04-02
sent):
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Some mail clients, usually the ones written with lists in mind, have a
shortcut
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 00:35 +0100, Shevek wrote:
Apologies for the new thread start - I can't seem to reply to anything
without a Suspicious Headers Moderator Approval response.
Mostly because they were HTML, I think. Posting plain text should have
got through.
One or two also seem to have
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:31 +0100, Chris Yearsley wrote:
In any case the success reports from rtmpdump2.4 are promising. Is
there a build for Windows?
There are resume-related fixes in 2.4 which are very promising, since
resumption of interrupted downloads has been one of the big problems.
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 11:50 +0100, zaphod wrote:
There's a link on this page,
http://rtmpdump.mplayerhq.hu/
to a windows version of rtmpdump 2.4
http://rtmpdump.mplayerhq.hu/download/rtmpdump-20110723-git-b627335-win32.zip
Thanks for pointing that out; I'd looked there but missed that
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 13:29 -0400, power...@aol.com wrote:
Is there any news on the Windows installer version of the Get I Player
program being updated?
Get I Player Version 2.79 doesnt seem to work any more.
Will the rtmpdump file be upgraded from 2.2d to version 2.4? Or is
there
On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 23:26 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
+ @git log --format='%aN' |sort -u CONTRIBUTORS; git add CONTRIBUTORS
+ @git commit -m Tag version $(VERSION) get_iplayer get_iplayer.1
CONTRIBUTORS
Applied; thanks.
--
dwmw2
On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 23:56 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Note: the date in the footer of get_iplayer.1 doesn't change when
the manual is generated. It should do, if the options change, but
I can't think of a good way to detect this without just doing it
maually.
diff --git a/Makefile
On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 21:38 +0100, dinkypumpkin wrote:
On 04/08/2011 20:21, David Woodhouse wrote:
I would love for someone to step forward and maintain the Windows stuff.
I won't volunteer to take over permanently because - like David - I
don't use Windows much and prefer to keep
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 19:24 +0100, dinkypumpkin wrote:
On 08/08/2011 11:47, David Woodhouse wrote:
It'd be really good to use 'pp' to make the subset of perl files that we
need for get_iplayer; the hack with a 'perlfiles.tar.gz' is horrid. Did
you look at what it would take to automate
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 17:41 +0100, Jon Davies wrote:
(I don't see why perl isn't just another
component, I can't see a good reason for it being included in the
installer, given that pretty much nothing else is.)
I looked at that. The subset of Strawberry Perl used for get_iplayer is
about a
On Sat, 2011-08-27 at 12:19 +0100, Carl Fletcher wrote:
I can confirm Proxy was required for video downloads attempted in USA
Carl, please trim your citations. Do not repeat any more of the previous
mail than you need to include for context.
--
dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 22:15 +, bat guano wrote:
OK thanks, I understand.
The program was installed originally using Synaptic Package Manager
(Ubuntu).
As you said, there is a file /etc/get_iplayer/options.
I'm happy enough to update from git.
Just need to replace the get_iplayer
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 09:26 +0200, Alan Stevens wrote:
Can't locate XML/LibXML/SAX.pm in @INC (@INC contains: C:/Program
Files/get_iplayer/lib .) at (eval 46) line 1.
I suspect the Windows installer was built with only the perl
dependencies required for get_iplayer itself, and not the web cgi
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 07:44 +0100, Kevin Reilly wrote:
Obviously the next step is to comment out each push command in turn to
determine which one, or ones, are actually causing the problem.
I'd get the files and run the command manually. Then see if you can
extract a small amount of the
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 21:49 +0100, richard_get_iplayer wrote:
After downloading three R4 Extra radio programmes, I got error message
on the last download. I'm using Ubuntu.
Ah, that makes it easier to find the problem; thanks.
Can you show the command line used to tag the file? So we can
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 11:53 +0100, richard wrote:
On Fri Sep 23 16:57:41 EDT 2011 David Woodhouse wrote:
Can you show the command line used to tag the file?
The command line used:
get_iplayer --type=radio --get 10623 --mode=flashaacstd
I was after the AtomicParsley command line
On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 13:18 +0100, dinkypumpkin wrote:
Long Version: The overall problem is that get_iplayer doesn't anticipate
programme metadata will contain character entities that are outside the
the ISO 8859-1 character set.
Ick. That's kind of broken. We should be using UTF-8
On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 18:37 +0100, dinkypumpkin wrote:
On 08/10/2011 16:20, David Woodhouse wrote:
If you *decode* UTF-8, that implies turning it into actual letters...
A different decoding in this case. What I mean here is that
HTML::Entities::decode_entities() returns a decoded string
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 08:51 +0100, JasonW wrote:
On 10 October 2011 01:25, Nigel Taylor njtay...@asterisk.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 10/09/11 17:13, bat guano wrote:
I think that would be a good feature.
Some programs (such as FFmpeg-git) show the 'commit'.
Releases should be made
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 19:45 +0100, dinkypumpkin wrote:
Fortunately,
RTMPDump is easy to build in Windows, so if we ever required a custom
build that wasn't available from elsewhere, we shouldn't be left high
and dry.
More to the point, it's easy to build with mingw32 on a real OS too.
--
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 19:45 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On a wider note, I am increasingly peturbed at the number of enquiries this
list receives about this sort of thing. I do not think we should encourage
people to access content to which they are not entitled because they do not
hold
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 10:41 -0500, Derek J. Balling wrote:
On Jan 6, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Chris Marriott wrote:
The fundamental issue is that BBC TV is only accessible to TV
licence payers, and if you're not a licence payer, you're not entitled
to view it.
Pedantically: UK residents are
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 11:04 -0500, Derek J. Balling wrote:
On Jan 6, 2012, at 11:01 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
Actually convincing the man with the detector van of that fact, and
getting them to stop hassling you, is of course another matter :)
Ha. Like there's any chance of a detector van
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 11:17 -0500, Derek J. Balling wrote:
On Jan 6, 2012, at 11:14 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
I'm not really sure the US way is better though — you have the *same*
rule for devi[cs]e and advi[cs]e, use 's' for both forms of licen[cs]e
and as far as I can tell nobody
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 16:23 +, Andy Waddington wrote:
I do, however, regard the TV licence people as entirely separate
from the BBC, whom I held in much higher regard - until they
started making TV programmes available on the net, as long as
you didn't use Linux or live somewhere too rural
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 08:00 +, John Rose wrote:
My messages to the mailing list have not been getting to it for the last
few days. I have not received any 'bounce' messages. Does anyone know
why this might be?
Looking at the moderation queue, the latest trapped message from you is
Jan
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 08:56 +, Rog wrote:
What sort of answer is that?
I've had the same problem with messages not getting through.
We are not all geniuses Mr Woodhouse, sd please explain to we the
uninitiated where we are going wrong.
If you can let me know the details (i.e. the
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 10:33 +, Rog wrote:
Hi David
Thanks, but it's too late as I recently purged my *Sent Items*
folder.
sod's law
OK. Let me know if/when it happens again.
Also, *please* make sure you trim your citations. Your reply should only
include as much of the previous message
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 13:06 +, Rog wrote:
- Original Message -
I couldn't find *any* new content of your own in that message. You
*only* seemed to repeat what I'd said, without citing it properly by
prefixing each line with a ''.
Your mail software, whatever you're using, seems to
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 15:36 +, John Rose wrote:
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:00:55 +
Message-ID:
CACns58WO=-HjgU0cYtGdptKr7+bMfH7iYA=vbfryyg68fnb...@mail.gmail.com
Subject: Re: Naive questions: RTMP packets output
From: John Rose john.aaron.r...@gmail.com
I looked up this one. It
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 16:53 +, Roger Rabbit wrote:
This is just a test post. Hopefully the first to come through on the
list via normal email. Didn't know about HTML being rejected, almost
abandoned this mailing list as my messages always got bounced!
That seems to have arrived. Note
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 16:17 +, John Rose wrote:
I also want to catch the terminal messages by placing the stdout
stderr output in a file.
I've tried:
bash get_iplayer --force --raw --stream 104 | mplayer -cache 3072 -
/home/john/Temporary/iRecorderLog.txt 21
and some variations. I
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 10:34 +, Chris Davies wrote:
On 21/02/12 10:26, Chris Davies wrote:
I've submitted a ticket to my ISP (as insisted upon by the BBC
ticketing system) and a complaint (I hate that word) to the BBC
iPlayer team.
...and now it's working again.
Very strange!
I
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 11:25 +0200, Vangelis forthnet wrote:
But, as if by magic, I can again reach these URLs as of yesterday
evening...
Bizarre, to say the least! Must've been some problem with my ISP and
how it redirected web requests. Thankfully, as said, all is fine now!
Sorry, no.
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 09:08 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
On 23 April 2012 08:43, Alastair aje...@errichel.co.uk wrote:
I get the digest for the list and have had all kinds of problems working
out how best to reply
without including all the list. One of these attempts recently resulted in
my
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 16:29 +0100, Derek Moss wrote:
It's easy enough to just copy and paste the data into notepad++ and
save it as get_iplayer.pl so no major problem, just wanted to point
out people following the instructions at
https://github.com/dinkypumpkin/get_iplayer/wiki/instructions
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 20:13 +0100, dinkypumpkin wrote:
AFAIK, David Woodhouse is the only one with sufficient access to
actually turn the key to create a new release (David: let me know
off-list if you want to delegate that minor chore - would require a
permissions change at your end
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 19:34 -0700, Arthur Murray wrote:
In my brief experience of using an IP outside the UK (and therefore
using a proxy), rtmpdump has required the UK IP (--socks parameter) if
connecting to akamai or it will receive an access denied error. The
entire video must go through
On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 11:58 +0100, Colin Parker wrote:
What is the easiest way to record all 114 Open Country radio 4
programmes (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qgft/episodes/player)?
Can't see a way to fetch the full list except on that page. So perhaps
something like...
for a in `seq 1
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 14:18 +0200, James Cook wrote:
Doesnt --pid-recursive do this?
e.g. get_iplayer.pl --profiledir=. --type=radio --pid b00X
--pid-recursive --get
With which pid? It didn't seem to work with either b006ggft or one of
the pids for the individual episodes, picked at
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 23:06 +0300, Derek J. Balling wrote:
This seems to me like a big mistake, no? Like we've just signed up
the mailing list to be a member of some spamming list?
I thought I'd already set the lists to reject all messages from Yahoo!
groups. I have now.
--
dwmw2
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 19:40 +0100, Derek Moss wrote:
At the moment users have to cut and paste the list address from the CC
field every time they want to reply to the list (using Reply All) and
that does seem stupid and bound to lead to messages accidentally being
sent privately instead of
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 12:14 +0100, Derek Moss wrote:
OK thanks, I'll do that then. I just thought it would be annoying for
the sender to receive the message via the list and directly.
It might be slightly annoying to some people who receive two copies of
the email. But it could be much *more*
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 13:38 -0400, Derek J. Balling wrote:
The logic behind the default is that the mail is technically from
Joe and if you reply, there's a CHANCE you want to just reply to
joe, and might be including information private for joe's eyes.
That's an interesting way of phrasing
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 10:18 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
But would they not always see it via the list?
No. They might not be subscribed to the list. Or they might be
subscribed, and filter it into a folder they never look at. Read the URL
I gave.
You can almost never be sure that they'll see the
This thread is starting to grate on my pedant's nerves.
It's 4GiB, not 4GB... or 4Gb or 4Gib.
1GiB is 1024 * 1024 * 1024 bytes; 1,073,741,824 bytes.
1GB is 1000 * 1000 * 1000 bytes; 1,000,000,000 bytes.
1Gb is 1000 * 1000 * 1000 *bits*; 125,000,000 bytes.
1Gib is 1024 * 1024 * 1024 bits;
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 20:52 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Indeed, something is wrong with casper.infradead.org, which hosts the
get_iplayer download page amongst other things. David Woodhouse will
read this and advise, I'm sure.
It's down for the weekend due to power maintenance. Should
The machine hosting www.infradead.org will be down this weekend for
power maintenance. Starting in a few minutes, and coming back on Monday.
Apologies for short notice; I've only just come to the conclusion that
I'm not going to manage to migrate web services off it, and I'm just
going to let
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 19:22 +, Shevek wrote:
On 9 February 2013 19:07, Steve Dimond st...@hillrise.demon.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
http://www.infradead.org/get_iplayer/html/get_iplayer.html. However, this
website is down now and I don't have the link to the program. Would someone
I'm not
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 00:28 +, dinkypumpkin wrote:
Thanks for running that down. Here is what I think it means:
1. ffmpeg was forked as libav in early 2011. Your ffmpeg 0.5.9 (from
Ubuntu Lucid repository) is derived from code before the fork.
2. Sometime after the fork - but
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 07:44 +0100, Pete Beardmore wrote:
nope, thwarted again. looks like i won't be sending the patch set.
the
size isn't the issue this time
I've approved your messages manually. For reference, the reason they got
trapped for moderation was because they were a reply (had
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 14:41 +0100, Philip Colmer wrote:
Unless I'm misunderstanding things, this looks like SWF verification is
failing. I thought that RTMPDump supported this now, so it is a bit odd to
be getting that error, unless that isn't the *real* cause?
Well, SWF verification works
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 23:38 +0100, dinkypumpkin wrote:
get_iplayer 2.83 has been released. Release notes here:
https://github.com/dinkypumpkin/get_iplayer/wiki/release283
I see you're moving away from the web site on www.infradead.org?
Do you want me to take the existing site down, or make
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 08:30 +0100, Shiner wrote:
I'll be surprised if I see this though!
There is something really odd about the way this mailing list works.
sigh
Not really. The rules are the same as fairly much every other mailing
list or effective email environment I've ever encountered;
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 22:36 +0100, Jonathan H wrote:
And this mailing list is doing my head in - the software is so
hopelessly antiquated, it won't even tag subject lines with
get_iplayer.
Why would it do that? The reverse-path of the message clearly identifies
where it comes from, so if you
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 17:19 +1200, Xtra wrote:
Few people these days have the the time or inclination to scroll
through often repeated screeds of historical background to finally get
to the latest contribution
Which is why you're supposed to *trim* your citations. As I have done
here, for
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 19:11 +0100, Ian Macdonald wrote:
Gmail seems to be a problem, you need to 'reply all' otherwise it just
goes to original poster
I'm not sure why you describe that as 'a problem'. What you said,
basically, is that with GMail you heed to use the 'reply all' option if
you
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 23:23 +0100, Roger Bell_West wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:10:56PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Did I miss anything?
That a standards-compliant modern MUA will also have a reply-to-list
function, which acts on the RFC2369 headers to direct a reply intended
forthe
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 10:35 +0100, Mable Syrup wrote:
The issue was that I was only getting digests to cut down on traffic,
Ah, right. Yeah, the digests are a stupid concept, and make it fairly
much impossible to do the right thing. I keep meaning to disable them
entirely.
Also, please make
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 11:38 +0100, Andrew Moore wrote:
Some of these posts come to me as attachments instead of text – is
that a new thing?
No, that's just a bug in your mail client.
dwmw2’s last post arrived as ATT00159.txt along with smime.p7s and no
legible text was in the 'message'
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 20:25 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
On 31 August 2013 12:33, J K.Eason j...@jeason.cix.co.uk wrote:
Sorry, was using 'reply all' - will stop that now - thanks for
pointing it out
Argh, no!
Using 'reply all' is exactly the *right* thing to do.
Except in odd circumstances,
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 20:46 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
On 30/08/2013 23:10, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 13:59 +0100, Mable Syrup wrote:
I'm sure there must be something, but I can't find it. I want to
reply to different items in a thread in a manner that preserves
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 21:50 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
I don't think it is odd, again on most of the lists I subscribe to
posters prefer not to get two copies, so Reply is the right thing to
do.
Have you actually read through the reply-to-list page that I have posted
a number of times now? I talk
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 15:29 -0700, Chris J Brady wrote:
Seems like the Beeb is getting litigatious ...
http://torrentfreak.com/major-tv-torrent-site-thebox-bz-calls-it-quits-130829/
“The decision to retire the site was not in response to any specific
threat
There can be little doubt that the
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 23:51 +0100, J K.Eason wrote:
That poster might like to investigate the settings on
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/get_iplayer -
specifically Avoid duplicate copies of messages.
For what it's worth, I've just looked and 'Avoid duplicate copies of
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 00:10 +0100, J K.Eason wrote:
The address 'j...@jeason.cix.co.uk' is not subscribed to the list;
you are subscribed with another address.
Thus, the list software doesn't *know* that it's a duplicate.
Ah that would explain it. Thanks David. I've now changed to the
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 23:26 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
On 31/08/2013 22:09, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 20:46 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
I'm sorry David, but I find this very offensive.
Before we continue, I would ask you to watch this video:
http://www.snotr.com/video/8285
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 01:24 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
On 31/08/2013 23:48, Stuart Henderson wrote:
As David is the list owner, I think it's reasonable for him to comment
on list admin matters..
You are quite right. I was unaware of David's position as list owner and
wouldn't have
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 13:33 +0100, TQ wrote:
If possible, whilst banging on about the simplest of issues regarding
the operation of mailing lists, would participants be so kind as to add
[NO ACTUAL GET_IPLAYER CONTENT] to the subject line, in order that the
posts might reach /dev/null with no
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 15:13 +0100, roadcone wrote:
I tried to send this to the group using my original identity but my
account is still blocked. I had thought that after the surrogate
apology and explanation by another and a request to be unblocked, this
might have happened. But it appears
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 10:56 -0700, Chris J Brady wrote:
Downloading programmes t.v. and radio are OK here (UK). CJB.
Seriously? You repeat the *entirety* of *two* messages, *and* the digest
header indicating that you should edit your Subject line to be more
specific, which you ignored *except*
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 21:43 +, Peter Oliver wrote:
I notice that the get_iplayer package at RPM Fusion hasn't been
updated for several years. Is there a reason for this? I could
become a co-maintainer if that would help.
Yes please :)
--
dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
I need to activate a Lenovo E73 downgraded to W7 Pro 64bit.
The Lenovo OEM key is rejected by MS.
Please do not (ab)use this list for things like that. This is not a Warez
forum.
This list is strictly for discussion of *legal* access to BBC content with
the get_iplayer tool.
We want it to
On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 11:54 -0700, Chris J Brady wrote:
I got this explanation
Chris, very soon all mail providers will change their DMARC policies to the
exact SAE policy used by Yahoo right now. All mail lists owners must adapt.
Read more here:
of the
message, right? And would also be broken by Yahoo's recent brain damage.
but this list has:
from: David Woodhouse x...@infradead.org
to: Chris J Brady x...@yahoo.com
cc: get_iplayer get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
The To: and Cc: are entirely interchangeable; that's purely cosmetic.
You
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 06:02 -0700, Chris J Brady wrote:
In a master stroke of security - or rather in an appalling LACK of
security - the mailing list owners / moderators have just sent me an
email confirming my membership - which included MY PASSWORD IN PLAIN
TEXT.
Sending such a reminder
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 09:37 -0700, Chris J Brady wrote:
My last post was bounced back with a suspicious header. Yet another
snafu due to Yahoo I suppose. CJB.
It was the standard thread-hijacking protection. Your post had 'Re:' in
the subject line but didn't appear to be a reply — it didn't
On 31 Jul 2014 at 19:20, Shevek Shevek she...@shevek.co.uk wrote:
On 31 July 2014 17:37, Chris J Brady chrisjbr...@yahoo.com wrote:
My last post was bounced back with a suspicious header. Yet another
snafu due to Yahoo I suppose. CJB.
Chris, also ALL your emails to the group end up in
On 15 September 2014 07:58, Shevek she...@shevek.co.uk wrote:
On 15 September 2014 00:59, dinkypumpkin dinkypump...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone else seeing bounce messages from copyri...@kickass.to as a
result
of posts to this list? It looks like some jackass subscribed that
address
to the
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 10:09 +0100, Owen Smith wrote:
Given that Reply goes to the sender, and Reply to All goes to the
sender and CC's the list, it is not surprising that replies are going
to the wrong place. I've done it several times myself.
Is it not possible to get the list software to
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
