for messages that would
otherwise have been prefixed by Warning, like
the current behavior.
Thanks,
Yitz
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Konstantine Rybnikov k...@k-bx.com
wrote:
Hi!
I'm bringing this up once again. Can we add Error: in the output of an
error in a similar way ghc
, but I hope
it's not that big of a problem).
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Konstantine Rybnikov k...@k-bx.com
wrote:
Sorry, I didn't get what you mean. Do you mean `error` [0] function from
Prelude? The discussion
the need for
consensus.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Sven
| Panne
| Sent: 25 January 2015 11:28
| To: Konstantine Rybnikov
| Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Put Error: before error output
|
| 2015-01-23 12
May I suggest something for a syntax (as an option, sorry if it's silly or
not related)? I really don't like neither @ or # because they seem too
hacky, meanwhile GHC already has an accessor syntax with braces { and },
so, might it be an option to have something like:
```
data Foo = Foo { val ::
Tuncer,
If warnings will be treated as errors it's fine to have Error: shown for
them, I think.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Tuncer Ayaz tuncer.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Konstantine Rybnikov wrote:
Hi!
I'm bringing this up once again. Can we add Error
Hi!
I'm bringing this up once again. Can we add Error: in the output of an
error in a similar way ghc shows Warning: for warnings? Main reasoning is
that, for example, on a build-server, where you have lots of cores to build
your program, if you get an error, it gets lost somewhere in the middle
On a slightly unrelated note I should say it would be great to have errors
contain word Error:. This is especially nice to have because when you
build with -j your error that stops compilation gets lost somewhere in
the middle of many warnings (which my projects have, unfortunately).
On Thu, Jan
