Re: nofib on Shake

2017-01-10 Thread Gracjan Polak
My time for this ticket run out and for the foreseeable future I won't be able to do much. We can discuss ideas if you have some. The part of nofib that is called fibno should be replaced with latest version of packages and permanently connected to the test suite. Or removed. This is the only

Re: nofib on Shake

2017-01-10 Thread Michal Terepeta
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:35 AM Gracjan Polak wrote: > I was looking nearby recently and you might want to take into account my > discoveries described in https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11501 Thanks a lot for mentioning it! (I didn't see this ticket/discussion)

Re: nofib on Shake

2017-01-10 Thread Gracjan Polak
I was looking nearby recently and you might want to take into account my discoveries described in https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11501 2017-01-08 18:48 GMT+01:00 Michal Terepeta : > Hi all, > > While looking at nofib, I've found a blog post from Neil Mitchell

Re: nofib on Shake

2017-01-09 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 19:48 + schrieb Michal Terepeta: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:56 PM Joachim Breitner > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 13:45 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari: > > > > We could also create a cabal and stack files for

Re: nofib on Shake

2017-01-09 Thread Michal Terepeta
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:56 PM Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 13:45 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari: > > > We could also create a cabal and stack files for `nofib-analyse` (making > > > it possible to use some libraries for it). > > > > > This

Re: nofib on Shake

2017-01-09 Thread Michal Terepeta
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 7:45 PM Ben Gamari wrote: > Michal Terepeta writes: > > > Hi all, > > > > While looking at nofib, I've found a blog post from Neil Mitchell [1], > > which describes a Shake build system for nofib. The comments mentioned > >

Re: nofib on Shake

2017-01-08 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 13:45 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari: > > We could also create a cabal and stack files for `nofib-analyse` (making > > it possible to use some libraries for it). > > > This would be great. This would allow me to drop a submodule from my own > performance monitoring tool.

Re: nofib on Shake

2017-01-08 Thread Ben Gamari
Michal Terepeta writes: > Hi all, > > While looking at nofib, I've found a blog post from Neil Mitchell [1], > which describes a Shake build system for nofib. The comments mentioned > that this should get merged, but it seems that nothing actually happened? > Is there

nofib on Shake

2017-01-08 Thread Michal Terepeta
Hi all, While looking at nofib, I've found a blog post from Neil Mitchell [1], which describes a Shake build system for nofib. The comments mentioned that this should get merged, but it seems that nothing actually happened? Is there some fundamental reason for that? If not, I'd be interested