My time for this ticket run out and for the foreseeable future I won't be
able to do much. We can discuss ideas if you have some.
The part of nofib that is called fibno should be replaced with latest
version of packages and permanently connected to the test suite. Or
removed. This is the only
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:35 AM Gracjan Polak
wrote:
> I was looking nearby recently and you might want to take into account my
> discoveries described in https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11501
Thanks a lot for mentioning it! (I didn't see this ticket/discussion)
I was looking nearby recently and you might want to take into account my
discoveries described in https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11501
2017-01-08 18:48 GMT+01:00 Michal Terepeta :
> Hi all,
>
> While looking at nofib, I've found a blog post from Neil Mitchell
Hi,
Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 19:48 + schrieb Michal Terepeta:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:56 PM Joachim Breitner
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 13:45 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari:
> > > > We could also create a cabal and stack files for
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:56 PM Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 13:45 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari:
> > > We could also create a cabal and stack files for `nofib-analyse`
(making
> > > it possible to use some libraries for it).
> > >
> > This
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 7:45 PM Ben Gamari wrote:
> Michal Terepeta writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > While looking at nofib, I've found a blog post from Neil Mitchell [1],
> > which describes a Shake build system for nofib. The comments mentioned
> >
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 13:45 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari:
> > We could also create a cabal and stack files for `nofib-analyse` (making
> > it possible to use some libraries for it).
> >
> This would be great. This would allow me to drop a submodule from my own
> performance monitoring tool.
Michal Terepeta writes:
> Hi all,
>
> While looking at nofib, I've found a blog post from Neil Mitchell [1],
> which describes a Shake build system for nofib. The comments mentioned
> that this should get merged, but it seems that nothing actually happened?
> Is there
Hi all,
While looking at nofib, I've found a blog post from Neil Mitchell [1],
which describes a Shake build system for nofib. The comments mentioned
that this should get merged, but it seems that nothing actually happened?
Is there some fundamental reason for that?
If not, I'd be interested