Your mail to 'Gimp-web' with the subject
Prefix.length, end))
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Message body is too big: 118998 bytes but there's a limit of 40 KB
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will
Hi,
David Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Currently the shared memory region that gimp uses to communicate to
and from plugins is readable and writable by every user on the system.
This is not good. I don't know what data or control information gimp
puts in this shared region, but someone
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:20:45 -0700 (PDT), Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Jun 2002, Michael Natterer wrote:
Yes, the plug-ins are simply forked and thus have the same uid.
The patch looks like the right thing to do to me. If nobody objects
for some reason, it will be
On 07 Jun 2002 16:35:46 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RaphaXl Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
./plug-ins/common/gif.c (David Koblas)
./plug-ins/common/tiff.c(Patrick J. Naughton)
We already knew about at least these and I was told (on #gimp I think)
that
Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
This has been fixed in Mandrake 8.0 one year ago, but we still got a
duplicate bug report related to it this year. And it took a while
for us to figure out that these apparently
Your mail to 'Gimp-user' with the subject
A special excite game
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Message body is too big: 129000 bytes but there's a limit of 40 KB
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you
Hi,
RaphaXl Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, I think that fixing this bug may introduce some new
problems: some plug-ins may run under a different user id than the
main program. For example, xscanimage may be installed with a setuid
bit on some systems if this is required in
Hi,
RaphaXl Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, the license used in these files contains the advertising
clause that is incompatible with the GPL. The copyright notice and the
permission notice must appear not only in the code, but also in the
supporting documentation (help
I am shocked this is not being considered a security problem.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Hi,
Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am shocked this is not being considered a security problem.
calm down, it is. It's already fixed in CVS and we will do a release
shortly after we've verified that it doesn't break things.
Salut, Sven
Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am shocked this is not being considered a security problem.
calm down, it is. It's already fixed in CVS and we will do a release
shortly after we've verified that it doesn't break things.
Well, the attitude of uninformed denial still sucks...
Unless I'm mistaken, gimp doesn't have any support for layer sets or
folders. Other programs, such as photoshop, allow you to group layers.
The layers inside the group will first be merged. Then the result will
then be merged with the remaining layers.
Are there any plans to add support for
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Marc Espie wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:48:58PM +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
Also, I think that some old systems (AIX? HP-UX?) had problems with
shared memory segments unless they were created with the mode 777.
This is very vague and I cannot find any
On 13 Jun 2002, Erin Tomson wrote:
Unless I'm mistaken, gimp doesn't have any support for layer sets or
folders. Other programs, such as photoshop, allow you to group layers.
The layers inside the group will first be merged. Then the result will
then be merged with the remaining layers.
14 matches
Mail list logo
