Hi,
Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 05:49, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
Heh, my vote is for Valgrind. :)
Well, valgrind is a very nice and useful tool. (I know becuase I'm also using
it extensively) However, I think that perhaps GNU Arch deserves to win
because:
And what
On Thursday 15 July 2004 15:30, David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 05:49, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
Heh, my vote is for Valgrind. :)
Well, valgrind is a very nice and useful tool. (I know becuase I'm also
using it extensively) However, I think that
Hi,
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The reason I think Arch should win the award instead of the GIMP is
because of the financial difficulties its main developer is
facing. I'm not aware of a similar financial difficulty within the
GIMP core developers. (but would like to be shown
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 15:17, Markus Triska wrote:
2. Its main developer (Tom Lord) is desperately in need of cash, as he is
currently unemployed. (or at least was the last time I checked).
Visit http://gnuarch.org/ for more information. While he is de facto
unemployed, as you say, he
On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in:
http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations
enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting point?
Please ask Tom, not me, because he is doing it, or visit his
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 05:49, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
Heh, my vote is for Valgrind. :)
Well, valgrind is a very nice and useful tool. (I know becuase I'm also using
it extensively) However, I think that perhaps
On Thursday 15 July 2004 21:52, Markus Triska wrote:
On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in:
http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations
enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting point?
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Markus Triska wrote:
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:52:36 +
From: Markus Triska [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Scheme [was Re: [Gimp-developer] OSCon attendance]
On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Each of the nominated projects
On Thursday 15 July 2004 07:12 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Anyone can go and write another
editor or bug tracker or window manager, if he'd like. That's one of the
rights that Liberalism gives you. But if someone wishes to embark on
something like that I'd advise him to contribute to an existing
Greetings, everyone.
Announcing the second public release of a tarball for the Tiny-Fu plug-in
for the 2.1 version of GIMP. The tarball must currently be hooked in to a
copy of the GIMP 2.1.x source tree by using the supplied gimp.patch patch
file. As of last night (Wednesday, July 14) the new
10 matches
Mail list logo
