Script-Fu is totally incomprehensible to graphic designers
it depends. i am a fluent script-fu speaker for example.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Path to Grid idea:
I've been experimenting with various grid types,
(esp. polar grids that don't get crowded in the
center.) What I came up with works quite nicely,
but then I had this idea for a more general
solution:
If grids were could be created from arbitrary paths,
we could create
I noticed that gimp is very slow for large images compared with
Photoshop. We were recently processing some 500Mb images, and on a fast
machine with 2Gb, gimp is crawling along, while on a slower machine with
only 512 Mb, photoshop is considerably faster. I attributed it to a
massive amount of
(sorry for all the offtopic comments about inkscape)
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:17:20 -0800
From: miriam clinton (iriXx) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakub Friedl (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer]
Miriam
okay... since i'm in the Hotel California where you can check in but
never check out
Sorry that the you were unable to unsubscribe, I have no idea why the
unsubscribe system didn't work for you but I'm pretty sure the developers
were joking and that if you are still unable to
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 11:17:20AM -0800, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
just to clarify - i'm here contributing from the point of view of a
professional graphic designer, considering the mainstream
Adobe/Macromedia market who would have never used GIMP, and how we can
'convert them over'
Hi,
Dov Kruger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I noticed that gimp is very slow for large images compared with
Photoshop. We were recently processing some 500Mb images, and on a fast
machine with 2Gb, gimp is crawling along, while on a slower machine with
only 512 Mb, photoshop is considerably
