Hi,
"Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 14 Jun 2002, at 15:19, Nick Lamb wrote:
>
> > OK, so the big problem is Script-Fu because it's fairly embedded and
> > it's somewhat hairy. The ordinary plugins aren't much of a problem, in
> > the very worst case they can be removed from the
On 14 Jun 2002, at 15:19, Nick Lamb wrote:
> OK, so the big problem is Script-Fu because it's fairly embedded and
> it's somewhat hairy. The ordinary plugins aren't much of a problem, in
> the very worst case they can be removed from the distribution
> temporarily.
>
> Surely the #1 thing someon
OK, so the big problem is Script-Fu because it's fairly embedded and it's
somewhat hairy. The ordinary plugins aren't much of a problem, in the very
worst case they can be removed from the distribution temporarily.
Surely the #1 thing someone should be doing (preferably someone who actually
knows
On 13 Jun 2002 21:18:52 +0200, "Sven Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RaphaXl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Unfortunately, the license used in these files contains the "advertising
> > clause" that is incompatible with the GPL. The copyright notice and the
> > permission notice must
Hi,
RaphaXl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately, the license used in these files contains the "advertising
> clause" that is incompatible with the GPL. The copyright notice and the
> permission notice must appear not only in the code, but also in the
> supporting documentation (h
On 07 Jun 2002 16:35:46 +0200, "Sven Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RaphaXl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > ./plug-ins/common/gif.c (David Koblas)
> > > > ./plug-ins/common/tiff.c(Patrick J. Naughton)
> > >
> > > We already knew about at least these and I was told (on #g
Hi,
RaphaXl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > ./gimp-1.2.1.in (Spencer Kimball, Peter Mattis)
> > > ./gimptool-1.2.1.in (Owen Taylor, Manish Singh)
> >
> > This is gibberish. Someone bolted on some boiler plate which claims that
> > the whole of the GIMP is covered by
On Wed, 29 May 2002 18:30:43 +0100, "Nick Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:26:07PM +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> > ./gimp-1.2.1.in (Spencer Kimball, Peter Mattis)
> > ./gimptool-1.2.1.in (Owen Taylor, Manish Singh)
>
> This is gibberish. Someone b
On 29 May 2002, at 16:36, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> On 29 May 2002 08:17:16 -0400, "Anthony DeRobertis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Here is a sorted list of files that have copyright notices that
> > > are not compatible with the GPL (derivatives of the BSD license
> > > with the so-called
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:26:07PM +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> ./gimp-1.2.1.in (Spencer Kimball, Peter Mattis)
> ./gimptool-1.2.1.in (Owen Taylor, Manish Singh)
This is gibberish. Someone bolted on some boiler plate which claims that
the whole of the GIMP is covered by an o
On 29 May 2002 08:17:16 -0400, "Anthony DeRobertis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, you might want to set a CC on the bugzilla bug to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shouldn't result in an ack war.
Unfortunately, this is not possible because "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
is not a valid Bugzilla account. It's a pit
Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2002 14:52:53 -0700, "Ben Gertzfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Howdy GIMP folks. Here are some points in the licensing of GIMP that
> > need to be addressed. Specifically, there's a lot of code that requires
> > that the authors be mentioned in the d
On Tue, 28 May 2002 14:52:53 -0700, "Ben Gertzfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy GIMP folks. Here are some points in the licensing of GIMP that
> need to be addressed. Specifically, there's a lot of code that requires
> that the authors be mentioned in the documentation, but there is no
Howdy GIMP folks. Here are some points in the licensing of GIMP that
need to be addressed. Specifically, there's a lot of code that requires
that the authors be mentioned in the documentation, but there is no
mention of them anywhere.
I'm not really up to speed with these issues, so if discus
14 matches
Mail list logo
