Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [FilmGimp] Which Gimp

2002-12-16 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On 16 Dec 2002 12:33:39 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RaphaXl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This is wrong. The plan was that Film Gimp and GIMP would merge > > around version 2.0 (you can check the gimp-dev mailing list archives > > from 2000 for some statements about t

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [FilmGimp] Which Gimp

2002-12-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, RaphaXl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is wrong. The plan was that Film Gimp and GIMP would merge > around version 2.0 (you can check the gimp-dev mailing list archives > from 2000 for some statements about that). This did not mean that any > project would cease to exist, but rat

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [FilmGimp] Which Gimp

2002-12-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Second, I would like to ask when a either a GEGL enabled Gimp will > be released, or a version of either Gimp with spfp/channel support > _or_ Film Gimp with a working xcf plugin will be avalible. when it is ready. Sorry, we never give any time

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [FilmGimp] Which Gimp

2002-12-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, RaphaXl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > http://filmgimp.sourceforge.net/docs/which.gimp.html > > I think that some parts of this article are really inaccurate and are > likely to cause some unnecessary damage to the reputation of both > projects (GIMP and Film Gimp). It looks lik

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [FilmGimp] Which Gimp

2002-12-12 Thread Patrick McFarland
First, I would like to apologize to everyone on the list. It seems my poking and proding around for 16-bit per channel rendering (which later changed into 32-bit float (spfp) per channel rendering) started a flamewar between gimp and film gimp developers. Second, I would like to ask when a either

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [FilmGimp] Which Gimp

2002-12-11 Thread Branko Collin
On 11 Dec 2002, at 13:58, Raphaël Quinet wrote: [trying to refute ... what?] As to the distributions thing: www.gimp.org is the place where you get the source. Binaries distributed from that site are just a matter of courtesy. This is not favouring or hating Windows. If anything, www.gimp.org fav

[Gimp-developer] Re: [FilmGimp] Which Gimp

2002-12-11 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 01:40:05 -0800, "Robin Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > More docs. > > http://filmgimp.sourceforge.net/docs/which.gimp.html I think that some parts of this article are really inaccurate and are likely to cause some unnecessary damage to the reputation of both projects (G