Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Damien Genet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Why can't you launch a « Gimp Fund » through paypal, like the Blender
foundation did ? I think that the Gimp has much more visibility than
Blender did, and would have no problems raising money. Actually, it may
even help to boost t
Hi,
Le mer 11/06/2003 à 11:45, Sven Neumann a écrit :
> I'm not sure if it would boost development, it might as well hurt it.
> The problem with money is that we would somehow have to decide how to
> spend it. Paying developers from such a fund could cause quite some
> disagreements. If others are
Hi,
Damien Genet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why can't you launch a « Gimp Fund » through paypal, like the Blender
> foundation did ? I think that the Gimp has much more visibility than
> Blender did, and would have no problems raising money. Actually, it may
> even help to boost the developmen
Hi,
Le mar 10/06/2003 à 17:02, Sven Neumann a écrit :
> I'd be happy if you nevertheless decided to help us with the
> conference. We already got some fundings from the FSF but we are
> still lacking about 5000 EUR. That's not much for a larger company and
> any donations would help. So if you,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 05:02:22PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> First of all, sorry for not getting back to you earlier.
ok, thanks better later than never :) I can better understand
your situation by now. Im just wondering how could this
avoid your attention during the core code development, sin
Hi,
Feczak Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> AFAIK, there are no plans to do such an improvement. Considered that
>> we still lack some funding for our developers conference this summer,
>> perhaps we could be persuaded to give it a try.
>
> Ok, what do you need to be more persuaded ?
Firs
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 05:25:14PM +0200, Feczak Szabolcs wrote:
> > AFAIK, there are no plans to do such an improvement. Considered that
> > we still lack some funding for our developers conference this summer,
> > perhaps we could be persuaded to give it a try.
>
> Ok, what do you need to be mor
Hi,
"Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was thinking abiut the subject , and came to a way of doing it -
> if PDB calls can be made normaly from inside these plugins - which I
> assume thay can, without problens.
We are not talking about plug-ins here. Previews for plug-ins are
ha
I was thinking abiut the subject , and came to
a way of doing it - if PDB calls can be made normaly
from inside these plugins - which I assume thay can, without problens.
Therefore, if you will allow me, I will describe what I was thinking in
"gimp pseudocode". Someone more familiar to the core t
> Feczak Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Changing the color balance/brightens-contrast/ color curves are
> > significantly slower in gimp vs. photoshop on the same machine. The
> > problem is not the processing time alone, but the preview takes the
> > same amount of time as the final pro
On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 18:28:42 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feczak Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Changing the color balance/brightens-contrast/ color curves are
> > significantly slower in gimp vs. photoshop on the same machine. The
> > problem is not the processing ti
Hi,
Feczak Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Changing the color balance/brightens-contrast/ color curves are
> significantly slower in gimp vs. photoshop on the same machine. The
> problem is not the processing time alone, but the preview takes the
> same amount of time as the final process
Hi,
I have sent this to the gimp-users list already, and nobody
could give me any hint to solve this, so it is probably
need to be improved.
"We would like to change from windows+photoshop to linux+gimp.
System description follows:
GNU Linux 2.4.20 / Debian Testing
Machines: 512MB SDRam, 733-1
13 matches
Mail list logo
