I fail to see why Tiny-fu can't be made backwards compatible with
SIOD; at least sufficiently enough to justify a direct substitution.
If compatibility is assumed as a premise (and the appropriate changes
to Tiny-fu implemented), the differences that Kevin Cozens described
all but disappear
On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 07:49:05 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 00:34 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> > What next?
> > Script-Fu should be removed from the GIMP source tree and made available
> > as a separately developed project. This would allow the first two iss
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 00:34 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> What next?
> Script-Fu should be removed from the GIMP source tree and made available
> as a separately developed project. This would allow the first two issues
> listed under "Differences" to be easily solved.
How would this solve t
Greetings, all.
The topic of Tiny-Fu as a replacement for Script-Fu surfaced once again.
This time in comment #2 of bug #329443 in Bugzilla. This was followed up
in comment #4 with:
In response to comment #2: I have no idea what Kevin is waiting for. It
seems that he lost interest in doing t
