Hi,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
> Yes, you miss the first and last error causes given above. A "local"
> process proves nothing about file accessibility.
>
> Think about it, X11 is a networked environment. Processes share an
> X-display, but not the filesystem view. Linux
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:08:29PM -0800, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I think the behavior should be as follows:
>
> By default, gimp should try to connect to a running instance, but *only*
> if it's on the same machine and running as the same user. gimp --remote
> (or if argv[0] ==
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:51:00AM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
>
> >> Would you mind to explain what sort of problems that would be? If we
> >
> > mozilla ./file
> >
> > => file not acesssible (permission denied, ot
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:51:00AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
>
> >> Would you mind to explain what sort of problems that would be? If we
> >
> > mozilla ./file
> >
> > => file not acesssible (permission denied, other user, inaccessibl
Hi,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
>> Would you mind to explain what sort of problems that would be? If we
>
> mozilla ./file
>
> => file not acesssible (permission denied, other user, inaccessible dir)
> => file not accessible (different machine)
> => file not acesssible (di
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:51:05PM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Would you mind to explain what sort of problems that would be? If we
mozilla ./file
=> file not acesssible (permission denied, other user, inaccessible dir)
=> file not accessible (different machine)
=> file not
Hi,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
> A thing to remember is that even when it is folded into the main
> gimp binary it still needs special command line switches (otherwise
> gimp will run into the same problems as mozilla/firebird etc. which
> often have frontend shell script
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 01:52:40AM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> department. What I would like to suggest today is to merge the
> gimp-remote functionality into the gimp binary. This would eliminate
> the confusion about which binary to use. It would also give us the
> chance to
Hi,
here's another mail from the "things we could do for gimp-2.4"
department. What I would like to suggest today is to merge the
gimp-remote functionality into the gimp binary. This would eliminate
the confusion about which binary to use. It would also give us the
chance to reimplement gimp-remot
