Hi,
Joshua D Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, this is interesting. I hope that we can cooperate on that and
share some code instead of implementing the same feature twice in
slightly different ways. I have just posted some comments about that
in bug #7379. Feel free to add your own
On 7 Dec 2002, at 18:19, Robin Rowe wrote:
Raphaël,
For an up-to-date GIMP contributor list see the bottom of
http://filmgimp.sourceforge.net/people/index.html .
As you have probably seen in the recent discussions on the
gimp-developer mailing list, it is not easy to get a correct list
On 02 Dec 2002 19:37:00 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robin Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your GIMP team list at http://www.gimp.org/the_gimp_org_about.html
includes Mattis and Kimball. Have they done anything with GIMP since
1997?
no, they haven't but of course they are
Hi,
Robin Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Who is working on GEGL and how active is that?
http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/gegl/ChangeLog
Your GIMP team list at http://www.gimp.org/the_gimp_org_about.html
includes Mattis and Kimball. Have they done anything with GIMP since
1997?
no, they
On 2 Dec 2002, at 10:23, Robin Rowe wrote:
Your GIMP team list at http://www.gimp.org/the_gimp_org_about.html
includes Mattis and Kimball. Have they done anything with GIMP since
1997? What are Mattis and Kimball doing now?
See http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-01/lw-01-
gimp.html.
Thus spoke Carol Spears
On 2002-11-28 at 1259.18 -0500, Patrick McFarland typed this:
Hrm. Side note, They got $1k from Linuxfund to further their project... hrm...
$1k would not be enough to by the beer for the people who develop The
GIMP (if i can at least add correctly).
But it might be
Thus spoke Robin Rowe
It is worth noting that the target audience of Film Gimp is motion picture
studios. It makes sense for Film Gimp to have goals distinct from Gimp. GEGL
is a different codebase from Gimp or Film Gimp. All three are run as
independent projects with different management
On 30-Nov-2002, Robin Rowe wrote:
A lot of text about how film gimp is trying to be its own thing.
Well, first I would like to say film gimp should be moving to a GEGL target.
Not because film gimp is gegl, but because gegl is so damn useful. (Well, will
be useful if/when it gets done.) And gegl
On 29-Nov-2002, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:55:06 -0500, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2002-11-28 at 1259.18 -0500, Patrick McFarland typed this:
Hrm. Side note, They got $1k from Linuxfund to further their project... hrm...
$1k would not be enough to by the
On Nov 28 Carol Spears ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
$1k would not be enough to by the beer for the people who develop The
GIMP (if i can at least add correctly).
If any GIMP developers come to visit Research Triangle Park (Central
North Carolina, USA) please drop me an email. I'd be happy to
10 matches
Mail list logo
