Why I could not find a Gamma Correction plug-in in GIMP 1.2.x? Is Gamma
Correction patented in the US?
I know there's Equalize, but I don't suppose it always work. I can
personally implement such a plugin. Gamma correction is a very simple
thing. The question is where can I find it if it's
Hi,
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why I could not find a Gamma Correction plug-in in GIMP 1.2.x? Is Gamma
Correction patented in the US?
It's there: Image-Colors-Levels. The middle entry of the Input Values
corresponds to Gamma.
Salut, Sven
On 20 May 2001, at 16:36, Sven Neumann wrote:
Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My suggestion is that the following plug-ins belong to the core
distribution:
[4 rules of inclusion snipped]
Can such a distinction be made?
You are right that we need to make such a distinction,
On 21 May 2001, at 14:58, Sven Neumann wrote:
Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, it seems to me that this whole things depends on finding
enough maintainers. Judging by the state of the web site (parts of
it have not been kept up-to-date for a while now) that is going to
be
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why I could not find a Gamma Correction plug-in in GIMP 1.2.x? Is Gamma
Correction patented in the US?
It's there: Image-Colors-Levels. The middle entry of the Input Values
corresponds to Gamma.
There
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2001-05-20 at 0133.49 +0200):
Regarding the question to include it with core Gimp: As already
discussed here several times, the plan is to distribute less
plug-ins with the Gimp core
One of the things that has been mentioned several times while
discussing the distribution of plug-ins is the fact that the menus are
too crowded, and new users can easily get lost. The user interface is
indeed a significant problem, but I think that it should be handled
separately from the
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 05:47:33PM +0200, Raphael Quinet wrote:
One of the things that has been mentioned several times while
discussing the distribution of plug-ins is the fact that the menus are
too crowded, and new users can easily get lost. The user interface is
indeed a significant
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 07:37:54PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Erm, I would be willing to help some with the web site. It would
seem a waste not to do what I am best at. Who should I turn to for
this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Several people expressed
On 21 May 2001, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
I'd suggest you use this mailing list to discuss the future of
www.gimp.org so we can all contribute. I'd also suggest you don't try
to tackle it all by your own but try to find a group of people willing
to do the work.
Adrian and I discussed the
On 21 May 2001, at 19:37, Sven Neumann wrote:
Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Erm, I would be willing to help some with the web site. It would
seem a waste not to do what I am best at. Who should I turn to for
this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Several people expressed their interest
Hi,
Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am sorry, no. I do not have enough time for that right now. I am
willing to help out, but not in such an important way. When I
volunteered, I was thinking more along the lines of helping to make
sure the site is up-to-date, i.e. that it
12 matches
Mail list logo
