The [WilberWorks] website
seems bought off and of course not much is left to be found on google
and friends. This is the best link I could find:
http://linux.rice.edu/webmap/appdescriptions/WilberWorks.html
Let's hope one of the folks involved into this can tell us more about
the goals of
Sven,
The [WilberWorks] website
seems bought off and of course not much is left to be found on google
and friends. This is the best link I could find...
Google deserves more credit.
Here's what Larry Ewing says:
http://www.isc.tamu.edu/~lewing/gimp/wilber.html
According to Wired,
Robin Rowe wrote:
Can anyone say with certainty whether that is the same Scott Goehring that
founded alt.religion.scientology?
In what way is this important?
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.foxbox.org/ co:3
i18n ought to be abbreviated i2n to make it quicker to
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:26:22 -0700, Robin Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The [WilberWorks] website
seems bought off and of course not much is left to be found on google
and friends. This is the best link I could find:
http://linux.rice.edu/webmap/appdescriptions/WilberWorks.html
At 21:31 12.10.03 +, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I am getting tired of maintaining the .def files that list entry
points exported by DLLs. Gcc doesn't really need them anyway. If you
don't give it any .def file, it exports all global symbols, just like
Unix compilers/linkers traditionally work. (All
Arnaud Charlet writes:
Is it really the case that MSVC can't create DLLs without .def files ?
No. But the alternative is to decorate every function and variable to
be exported with __declspec(dllexport). That would clutter the headers
unbearable. (The exported variables do have to be decorated
Tor Lillqvist writes:
No. But the alternative is to decorate every function and variable to
be exported with __declspec(dllexport).
To be more precise, preprocessor macros would have to be used in such
a way that when compiling the library in question, the compiler sees
__declspec(dllexport),
