On Saturday 23 August 2008 01:22:18 you wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 20:22 +0300, Alexia Death wrote:
My proposal is basically this:
http://a.death.pri.ee/2.6_default_layout_proposal.png
IMO the tool-options should definitely be part of the toolbox.
My opinion is exactly opposite
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 11:18 +0300, Alexia Death wrote:
In my opinion this layout(thin toolbox, one large dock) is preferable to
first
time users. It has familiarity. They wont feel lost when GIMP loads for the
first time.
For a new GIMP user it is crucial that the tool-options are
On Saturday 23 August 2008 13:19:35 Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 11:18 +0300, Alexia Death wrote:
In my opinion this layout(thin toolbox, one large dock) is preferable to
first time users. It has familiarity. They wont feel lost when GIMP loads
for the first time.
For a
If you check this list's log you'll learn that the layout you suggest
has already been proposed about a year ago.
I know because I did it.
Later I proposed that layout again in my brainstorm entry about the
no-image-open dialog.
I used that layout for several months, but I changed my mind. And
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:29:40 +0200, Alexia Death [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
and third, a bit of familiarity for the first time
users(separate, 2 line toolbox) can not hurt.
--
Hi,
that's the second time you propose familiarity for a first time user.
How can a first time user be familiar
On Saturday 23 August 2008 22:51:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that's the second time you propose familiarity for a first time user.
How can a first time user be familiar with anything? Or is this another
Gimp should look and behave like Photoshop proposal?
No it should not look like
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 16:44 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
They tell us that this layout is better for new users, but every new
user I know (mostly when they come from windows) the first thing they do
is closing the right docker (trying to close the program). And they
loose it forever
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 22:29 +0300, Alexia Death wrote:
I think I need to state that my image was not an exactly like this
proposal.
There are altogether three points it tries to make. First, the image window
needs to be incorporated into the default layout.
Care to explain how the
This has been addressed in GIMP 2.5. And the change is even explained in
the release notes.
Oh, I didn't read that part. Great news. Thanks!
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Hi Geert,
I have a small patch to scale-region.c that I would to have your opinion
on. I noticed that the current code sometimes does an unneeded copy
operation. This happens when the scale factor is 2^n. For example when
an image of 800x600 pixels is scaled to 400x300. The function
Well, the thing I like most on Gimp is that you can squasch and squeeze
it the way you want.
I teach classes for adults how to use Gimp. And the first thing my
pupils do is to learn how to insert new dialogs and how to optimize the
toolbox.
I work with a beamer in my classes and most of them
Alexia Death wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2008 22:51:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that's the second time you propose "familiarity" for a first time user.
How can a first time user be familiar with anything? Or is this another
"Gimp should look and behave like Photoshop" proposal?
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 20:22 +0300, Alexia Death wrote:
[...]
My proposal is basically this:
http://a.death.pri.ee/2.6_default_layout_proposal.png
I think there's some good here, although I also think changes here might
be better targeted at 2.8.
I like the Z-brush and RawTherappee style of
13 matches
Mail list logo
