Hi,
This recent change break gimp build from autogen.sh.
2001-11-14 Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* configure.in: new directories etc/, data/images/ and data/misc/.
* Makefile.am
* data/Makefile.am: added new SUBDIRs.
* data/images/Makefile.am
Hi,
A tooltip talking about brush sizes in gimpressionist was mentioning
"direction" instead. Is the attached diff OK to commit? Wanna confirm, since
gimp 1.2.3 releasing date should be close(?).
Abel
--- /home/maddog/size.c Wed Aug 30 16:20:24 2000
+++ ./size.cThu Nov 15 05:47:21
hello,
will gimp support the "mng" fileformat ??
i have to make little animations, but i don't want to use the gif-format
(because of the patent).
so i read on the site www.burnallgifs.org of the format mng, but my gimp 1.2,
doesn't know it.
thank you for your answer and the wonderful gimp.
Hi,
DindinX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi,
>
> I've found a bug in the current CVS tree:
> - make a screenshot (File->Aquire->Screenshot)
> - save it as a jpeg
> - close it
> - make another screenshot
> - save it as a jpeg -> segfault.
>
> After some investigation, this is due to
hi,
I've found a bug in the current CVS tree:
- make a screenshot (File->Aquire->Screenshot)
- save it as a jpeg
- close it
- make another screenshot
- save it as a jpeg -> segfault.
After some investigation, this is due to the comment code.
The default comment is corrupted the seco
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 14 Nov, Raphael Quinet wrote:
>> Hmmm... Of course, Bugzilla goes down just when I send a mail telling
>> everybody to use it. It looks like bugzilla.gnome.org is not the only
>> address affected, because www.gnome.org seems to be down as we
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 14 Nov, Raphael Quinet wrote:
>> Bugzilla is usually better at handling bugs than this mailing list:
>> - Bugzilla is available to everybody, including those who do not read
>> this list. I think that it was a mistake to send the 1.3.0
>> an
On 14 Nov, Raphael Quinet wrote:
> Bugzilla is usually better at handling bugs than this mailing list:
> - Bugzilla is available to everybody, including those who do not read
>this list. I think that it was a mistake to send the 1.3.0
>announcement to the gimp-user list (it should have b
On 14 Nov, Raphael Quinet wrote:
> Hmmm... Of course, Bugzilla goes down just when I send a mail telling
> everybody to use it. It looks like bugzilla.gnome.org is not the only
> address affected, because www.gnome.org seems to be down as well.
> They do not even respond to ping.
Hm, it worked
Hmmm... Of course, Bugzilla goes down just when I send a mail telling
everybody to use it. It looks like bugzilla.gnome.org is not the only
address affected, because www.gnome.org seems to be down as well.
They do not even respond to ping.
The downtimes on these hosts have been rather short in
Raphael Quinet wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Rebecca J. Walter wrote:
> >> Can somebody explain to me why bug reports are A Bad Thing in this
> >> case?
> >
> > Because it is too broken. It would result in 6 zillion bug reports.
> > The release is intended for DEVELOPERS... for people who
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Rebecca J. Walter wrote:
>> Can somebody explain to me why bug reports are A Bad Thing in this
>> case?
>
> Because it is too broken. It would result in 6 zillion bug reports.
> The release is intended for DEVELOPERS... for people who want to hack on
> it and make patch
> Can somebody explain to me why bug reports are A Bad Thing in this
> case?
>
> I can understand that with code that is changing fast, yesterday's
> bug report can be yesterday's news, but if bug reports are of no use
> at all (in other words, the developers only fix the problems they can
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
