Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-10 Thread David Neary
Hi all, Roman Joost wrote: On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 10:06:50PM +0100, raymond ostertag wrote: What is the statut now ? Since christmas I only have a few html files with only xinclude in it. A new cvs update should bring you all the changes. I hope, that the anonymous gnome cvs servers are

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-10 Thread Daniel Egger
On Jan 10, 2004, at 1:45 pm, David Neary wrote: I hope these kinds of comments aren't out of place. I have noticed that commits to gimp-help-2 are fairly infrequent, and tend to affect lots of files. It is better all round if there are more frequent commits, each one making a distinct change.

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-10 Thread David Neary
Daniel Egger wrote: It is better all round if there are more frequent commits, each one making a distinct change. IMHO your given rule of a thumb is not completely correct because the granule of a commit should not be the smallest possible change in a single file but the smallest possible

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, raymond ostertag [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Le lun 05/01/2004 00:49, Roman Joost a crit : a) Screenshots should be made with the standard GNOME theme and a generic font (like Bitstream Sans). Standard GNOME theme is ? I don't remember but on my Mandrake the standard is Galaxy

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 news ...

2004-01-10 Thread Daniel Egger
On Jan 10, 2004, at 4:38 pm, David Neary wrote: It kind of does - it's not changeset oriented in the way that BK or Arch are, but checking in several files at once is possible, and cvs2svn manages to make changesets out of commits that happen with the same comment, at the same time, by the same