Sven Neumann wrote:
It would be easy to add this. I would even add it as a core function,
not as a script, as it is much easier to implement in the core.
I am not sure about the name though. Duplicate Visible doesn't quite
hit it. Perhaps someone has a better idea?
Maybe call it New
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 11:31 -0700, vabijou2 wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
As far as real estate on
the bottom of the layers dialog goes, I would eliminate the raise/lower
layer buttons I don't ever use them since it is easier to drag the
layer itself to the new
Von: komputes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you are a GIMP developer, please let me know what you think of this by
posting to bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=546344
No. Replies go here, this was the point of Sven's comment.
HTH,
Michael
--
GMX Kostenlose Spiele: Einfach
Von: Martin Nordholts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMO letting the user have full control of what fonts that is available
in GIMP completely aligns with the product vision [1].
I'd expect to be able to tag them.
Michael
--
GMX Kostenlose Spiele: Einfach online spielen und Spaß haben mit Pastry
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: Martin Nordholts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMO letting the user have full control of what fonts that is available
in GIMP completely aligns with the product vision [1].
I'd expect to be able to tag them.
Isn't it what is usually done by
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: Martin Nordholts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMO letting the user have full control of what fonts that is available
in GIMP completely aligns with the product vision [1].
I'd expect to be able
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 8:24 PM, komputes wrote:
Alexandre, Fontmatrix, allows you to tag your fonts but I don't think it
has control over deactivating system fonts.
It actually does deactivate them. At least that's what I see in the
SVN trunk version (v0.5 is coming).
Even if it didn't, that
2008/8/7 Omari Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 11:31 -0700, vabijou2 wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
As far as real estate on
the bottom of the layers dialog goes, I would eliminate the raise/lower
layer buttons I don't ever use them since it
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 10:13 +0300, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
Maybe call it New layer from visible or New from visible in layers
context as an analogue to Copy visible?
That's what we did. This is now in SVN. Together with a new procedure
gimp-layer-new-from-visible in the PDB.
Oh,
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 07:19 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
I think the bug report is valid and should be reopened.
Not unless someone finds out how this can be done. I had a look at the
code and I don't think we can persuade fontconfig to exclude the system
fonts.
Sven
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 22:09 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Since the test results are looking good, I think we should commit the
changes then so that they get more testing. Does anyone disagree with
this? Otherwise I will commit the changes later this week.
The changes are in trunk for some
Hello:
This is not directly related to the bug, although the following provides a
possible alternative to fixing the corner pixel proglems of the existing
lanczos...
A student of mine and I have put together a gimp plug-in which ENLARGES images
using a method which is analogous to global
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:20:00 +0200, Nicolas Robidoux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A student of mine and I have put together a gimp plug-in which ENLARGES
images using a method which is analogous to global cubic splines, that
is, which gives results analogous to lanczos.
Hi,
in what way do
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 7:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:20:00 +0200, Nicolas Robidoux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A student of mine and I have put together a gimp plug-in which ENLARGES
images using a method which is analogous to global cubic splines, that
is,
14 matches
Mail list logo
