Re: [Gimp-developer] Silent profile embedding.
Hi, On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 23:03 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: So I can go ahead and revert this commit then? (rev 23135): 2007-08-07 Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org * plug-ins/common/png.c (save_image): in the absence of an embedded color profile, write the sRGB chunk. I don't think we should do any code changes before we know exactly what we want. IMO we should first determine what we want, create a set of test cases and find out what the current code is doing. Then, when we know what needs to be changed, open bug reports and do the changes. Otherwise we will end up with an inconsistent mess. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Silent profile embedding.
On Sunday 08 February 2009 08:39:38 am Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 06:44 +0900, Yoshinori Yamakawa wrote: I wrote a small patch for checking embedded profile . http://cue.yellowmagic.info/softwares/files/profile_status.diff Example 1: Image has no profiles http://cue.yellowmagic.info/softwares/images/gimp_profile_status1.png Example 2: Open the gray-scaled image that has Dot Gain 15% profile http://cue.yellowmagic.info/softwares/images/gimp_profile_status2.png I don't quite understand what this patch is supposed to do. The display of color profile information in the Image Properties dialog is already there. What does your patch add? To me it looks like the dialog only becomes more confusing and misleading. Sven I am finding this thread to be confusing. In the Color Management section of the Preferences dialog there is a drop down to set the File Open behavior and the options are Ask what to do, Keep embedded profile and Convert to RGB workspace. Shouldn't this setting also affect the way files opened without an embedded profile work? If not then either is should be generalized to do so or another preference item for how to handle images with no profile should be added with similar options. that way the user will have control over how this behaves. Hal ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Silent profile embedding.
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:39:38 +0100 Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org wrote: I don't quite understand what this patch is supposed to do. The display of color profile information in the Image Properties dialog is already there. What does your patch add? To me it looks like the dialog only becomes more confusing and misleading. I'm sorry that I can't explain in English very well. See the following image: http://cue.yellowmagic.info/softwares/images/gimp_profile_status_comparison.png In case of using the GIMP and any other softwares, handling the image without color profile is very important. Some software may handle it in the different workspace. Some software may handle it without color management. The behavior of the other software becomes unpredictable if the GIMP covers that the image doesn't have profile. -- Yoshinori Yamakawa y...@yellowmagic.info ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] brush rotation
For those of you who don'tṫ follow trunk closely or the irc channel, I can't resist the urge to tell that Alexia Death and Mich have been working on brush dynamics over the last few days - and have thus far added brush rotation. It now works both as a fixed factor and following painting direction. Yaii!! (as any brand new feature, it still buggy and error prone, but they are actvelyy fixing everything) js -- ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
