I understood gimp 2.7 will fix this kind of problem, if that´s the case,
then I will be waiting for 2.7.
About Jerry way of doing things I think it makes more sense (at least)
to me. I do not know very well how to use your script but I´ll find a
way to give it a shot buddy.
Em Sex, 2010-03-05 às
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 08:41 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 08:01 -0500, lloyd konneker wrote:
> > I agree with Joao S. O. Bueno and disagree with David Bowers.
>
> Well, I'm glad you don't disagree with me, but who is that?
>
Sorry I mangled your name. BTW David Bowers
>>> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 08:01 -0500, lloyd konneker wrote:
> I agree with Joao S. O. Bueno and disagree with David Bowers.
Well, I'm glad you don't disagree with me, but who is that?
>
> Its better to make plugins meet the normal expectations of Python
> programmers (you can import any Python f
I've verified the behaviour is inconsistent, at least which could be
considered a bug. I assumed it would go to the last drawable, but
that isn't so...
Deleting a channel always makes the channel that was below it active
(regardless of the active order before), unless it is the last
channel, in w
I've always hated the way that worked, I've got a script that deletes
the active layer, then sets the layer underneath it to active if anyone
wants to use it...
#!/usr/bin/env python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
#
# delete-layer.py - Version 1.0
# Copyright (C) 07/11/2008 by Jerry Baker
# www.
On 03/05/2010 03:20 AM, Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira wrote:
> Hi again, the original discussion is in the link below:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611758
>
> I was advised to present this idea here, what do you think?
>
> Also I do not mind much about not having a selected layer after
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Akkana Peck wrote:
> Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira writes:
>> Also I do not mind much about not having a selected layer after
>> the deletion of a layer. But the forced viewer scroll down( or up ),
>> depending of the last selected layer is a problem.
>
> This used to
Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira writes:
> Also I do not mind much about not having a selected layer after
> the deletion of a layer. But the forced viewer scroll down( or up ),
> depending of the last selected layer is a problem.
This used to annoy me a lot, because I frequently want to delete,
say, t
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 08:01 -0500, lloyd konneker wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if importing a plug-in from another plug-in is really
something
>> that we want to support. If the goal is to share code, then perhaps
the
>> code that is worth sharing
