Hello I am in need of a TOP viewer or file viewer to work with Gimp for a
digipad.
Any questions please ask!
Larry
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Sorry, I should have replied to the list sooner. Another member's
(David Gowers) suggestion to use the --with-xinput when compiling GTK
worked perfectly.
Thanks-
Larry
On 3/3/06, Andrew Zabolotny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 18:35:26 -0500
> "
re another dependancy/option I'm missing or is it broken in
2.3.x?
Thanks-
Larry
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
The default histogram display seems wrong in Gimp, by the standards of
photoshop and a number of other image management programs. There is a link
below to an image demonstrating what I mean. (I am cross-posting this to
Filmgimp, because there seems to be common histogram code).
An optional plug-
Where is the best documentation on parasites?
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 10:07:39PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 06:21:08PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is there any way (a widget or otherwise) to store sets of parameters,
> > perhaps giving them a name?
>
> You can
I notice that perl-fu remembers (i) defaults and (ii) the last executed
parameters, and that you can revert to the "prior" parameters.
Is there any way (a widget or otherwise) to store sets of parameters,
perhaps giving them a name?
I have scripts that take wildly different parameters dependin
Is there anything built into Perl-fu that would permit me to "queue up"
scripts, rather than having them run concurrently?
I don't have the system resources to manage multiple tasks, but I'd like to
be able to run scripts from the command line or from within gimp without
having them all fighting
Yes there is.
There is a perl-fu script entitled "gimpmagick" that
interoperates with ImageMagick.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:14:16PM -0400, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> At 1:31 PM -0400 8/29/02, airbete full wrote:
> >ImageMagick has several interesting algorithms (NoiseReduction,
> >Despeckle
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 01:02:22PM +0100, Tino Schwarze wrote:
> What are you expecting by upscaling pictures? Why do you do that? It
> will definitely not improve quality as there is no gain in information.
Isn't it better to upscale pictures using Gimp's bicubic interpolation
prior to printin
I've been following some instructions oriented toward photoshop that
talk of unsharpen mask settings including a radius of 0.3 or 0.8.
I notice that Gimp's implementation has a minimum radius of one.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
What does a Windows program like Genuine Fractals do that Gimp cubic
interpolation does not do, when I'm upscaling photographs for
printing to 8x10 and beyond?
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listi
Recently there's been a lot of excitement in the digital camera world
among former B&W film afficianodos who are simulating the use of colored
filters by manipulating color channels prior to converting a digital
image to greyscale.
Photoshop has a feature that lets you weight color channels when
Ah so it is the libraries fault that it crashes when you pass it an
unterminated string? Cool.
--Larry
On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 07:58, Kelly Martin wrote:
> On 29 Aug 2001 14:44:49 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >>Has this been reported as a bug in GTK?
Federico
hasn't timj complained loudly about how broken the code in
gdk_pixbuf_get_from_drawable is? Of course the code he wrote for the
desk guide likes to segfault, so who knows.
--Larry
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
14 matches
Mail list logo
