Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po

2001-10-05 Thread Kelly Martin
On 02 Oct 2001 16:44:18 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: It is physically impossible to synchronize clocks. Sounds like a fundamental problem with the design of the universe. Indeed. We should return the universe for a refund. Kelly

[Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po

2001-08-29 Thread Christophe Merlet
David Odin wrote: Hi, You'll find a patch for the gimp/po/fr.po file attached to this mail. I hope this is the right list for this. Thanks, I'll commit your patch. Librement, -- Christophe Merlet (RedFox) ___ Gimp-developer mailing

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po

2001-08-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Christophe Merlet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You'll find a patch for the gimp/po/fr.po file attached to this mail. I hope this is the right list for this. Thanks, I'll commit your patch. feel free to commit, but please commit to the stable branch (gimp-1-2). Salut, Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po

2001-08-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Christophe Merlet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This was a patch against the HEAD branch of gimp... then I've commited to the HEAD branch... fine. I just want to take the opportunity to explain once again how we treat translations at the moment and why we do it this way. The CVS HEAD

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po

2001-08-29 Thread Christophe Merlet
Sven Neumann wrote: One more thing to consider: Localisation in GIMP HEAD is considerably broken since we have to switch all the po files to UTF-8. You can create some nice crashes if you try to start GIMP from CVS HEAD with LC_ALL != C since GTK+-2.0 doesn't like to be passed invalid UTF-8

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po

2001-08-29 Thread Kelly Martin
On 29 Aug 2001 10:59:06 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: One more thing to consider: Localisation in GIMP HEAD is considerably broken since we have to switch all the po files to UTF-8. You can create some nice crashes if you try to start GIMP from CVS HEAD with LC_ALL != C since

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po

2001-08-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Kelly Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 29 Aug 2001 10:59:06 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: One more thing to consider: Localisation in GIMP HEAD is considerably broken since we have to switch all the po files to UTF-8. You can create some nice crashes if you try to

UTF8 in GTK+ 2.0 (was Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po)

2001-08-29 Thread Nick Lamb
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 07:58:52AM -0500, Kelly Martin wrote: In my opinion, a library which crashes when fed inappropriate external data is buggy by definition. Let's be more specific: Does the GTK+ UTF8 implementation meet the requirements for security purposes laid down in Unicode 3.0.1

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po

2001-08-29 Thread Stephen Robert Norris
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 09:38:45PM -0500, Kelly Martin wrote: On Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:05:15 +1000, Stephen Robert Norris [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: So it's the library's fault if I pass it a bad pointer and it causes a SEGV? Yes. Kelly I'd be interested to know how to avoid that. I'm

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po

2001-08-29 Thread Larry Ewing
Ah so it is the libraries fault that it crashes when you pass it an unterminated string? Cool. --Larry On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 07:58, Kelly Martin wrote: On 29 Aug 2001 14:44:49 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Has this been reported as a bug in GTK? Huh? It's not a bug, it's a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po

2001-08-29 Thread Lourens Veen
Stephen Robert Norris wrote: Yes, this is a way the application can avoid the problem; it's not a way the library can. My point was that it's impossible with modern OS's to avoid the possibility of the library crashing. Ah, we agree then, that was the point I was trying to make as well

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po

2001-08-29 Thread Stephen Robert Norris
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:22:26PM -0500, Kelly Martin wrote: On Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:42:05 +1000, Stephen Robert Norris [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'd be interested to know how to avoid that. I'm pretty sure I can construct a scenario (with multiple threads and memory mapping, for example)

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po

2001-08-29 Thread Lourens Veen
Stephen Robert Norris wrote: I'd be interested to know how to avoid that. I'm pretty sure I can construct a scenario (with multiple threads and memory mapping, for example) where it's impossible to tell until you get the SEGV. For instance, I memory map a file, pass a pointer into the mapped

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: patch for gimp/po/fr.po

2001-08-29 Thread Stephen Robert Norris
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 07:34:57AM +0200, Lourens Veen wrote: Stephen Robert Norris wrote: I'd be interested to know how to avoid that. I'm pretty sure I can construct a scenario (with multiple threads and memory mapping, for example) where it's impossible to tell until you get the SEGV.