Re: [Gimp-developer] Bucket fill, Fill with foreground and gradient

2001-06-06 Thread Sven Neumann

Hi,

Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 The Magic Wand is not the only way to make a selection. I agree it 
 sounds logical that one would want to stroke or fill a wand selection 
 completely, but I can think of uses for a threshold fill with a 
 rectangular or elliptical selection.

you can intersect a magic wand selection with an existing selection
by pressing Ctrl-Shift.
 
 BTW, I checked out how my GIMP (Win32) deals with changing the 
 content of dialogs: when having two image windows open plus the 
 layers dialog (Layers, Channels  Paths), and then switch between 
 image windows, the contents of the latter does not change until I 
 click in the new image window. Would it be possible to make it so 
 that the contents of such dialogs change when you only activate the 
 new image window? Or is this just a Windows GTK+ thing? 

The active image is only switched if you perform an action in the 
image. Pressing Space counts as an action here. This behaviour is
intentional and was discussed here before.


Salut, Sven

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] Bucket fill, Fill with foreground and gradient

2001-06-01 Thread Seth Burgess


 If you guys decide to program a Bucket Fill
 function that 
 always fills the whole selection, then the interface
 should mirror 
 this: once a user has made a selection and then
 doubleclicks on the 
 Bucket Fill icon to conjure up the Bucket Fill
 dialog, the threshold 
 should be put to maximum (255) and grayed out. 

Thats only accurate for the one image though :(
 
 I consider it to be a bug that there is a
 discrepancy between what 
 the program interface (in the shape of the Bucket
 Fill dialog) tells 
 me and what the program actually does.

In a case for more than one mode of image and only one
tool, this will unfortunately always be the case.

 Second, I feel that (in the light of User Interface
 rule #1 that says 

Rules were made to be broken.  Users often don't know
whats best - they just know if something is easy to
use.  It takes lots of thought and planning to make
that happen.  We shouldn't be afraid of offending
users by making changes - just be sure we're moving in
the right direction.

Seth


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] Bucket fill, Fill with foreground and gradient

2001-06-01 Thread Branko Collin

On 1 Jun 2001, at 8:14, Seth Burgess wrote:

Branko:

  If you guys decide to program a Bucket Fill
  function that always fills the whole 
  selection, then the interface should mirror 
  this: once a user has made a selection and then
  doubleclicks on the Bucket Fill icon to 
  conjure up the Bucket Fill dialog, the threshold 
  should be put to maximum (255) and grayed out. 
 
 Thats only accurate for the one image though :(
 
  I consider it to be a bug that there is a
  discrepancy between what the program interface 
  (in the shape of the Bucket Fill dialog) tells 
  me and what the program actually does.
 
 In a case for more than one mode of image and only one
 tool, this will unfortunately always be the case.

Still, in a sequence of actions as I described (select -- Bucket 
Fill dialog -- bucket fill) visual feedback will at least give me a 
hint that something special is going on. 

A better thing might be putting something in a (the) status bar of 
the image window, but I do not want to propose cluttering up that 
window.

  Second, I feel that (in the light of User Interface
  rule #1 that says 
 
 Users often don't know whats best - they just know if 
 something is easy to use. 

And often that is the best. 

 Rules were made to be broken. It takes lots of thought 
 and planning to make that happen.  We shouldn't be 
 afraid of offending users by making changes - just be sure 
 we're moving in the right direction.

That is why I said 'unless'. However, if no-one can fill in the 
unless, the rule applies. 

-- 
branko collin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer