On 13 December 2010 19:56, Sven Neumann wrote:
> This is GIMP based on GTK+ for X11. It needs an additional X11 server
> running on OS X and thus integration into the system is very poor. What
> I was talking about is the Quartz backend for GTK+ which allows GIMP to
> run as a native application.
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 10:45 +, jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 7 December 2010 22:07, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > in GIMP on OS X. Even though there's a pretty well working Quartz port
> > of GTK+, there haven't been any successful attempts to make a binary
> > GIMP installer from this (as far as I
On 7 December 2010 22:07, Sven Neumann wrote:
> in GIMP on OS X. Even though there's a pretty well working Quartz port
> of GTK+, there haven't been any successful attempts to make a binary
> GIMP installer from this (as far as I know). I very much doubt that
gtk-osx is used to make binary instal
On 07.12.2010 19:15, Filipe Sim-Sim wrote:
> Now before any flamming and discussion on the GPL, i would like to
> state that the App Store webpage on Gimp should clearly state that
> this is opensource software, that you can download the source and/or
> the binary from the project page and that th
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 18:15 +, Filipe Sim-Sim wrote:
> My idea is this: Put Gimp on the App Store. with a symbolic fee, let's
> say 2.5$ . If the 70/30 ratio of apple store is applied, then that
> should be 1.75$ for each download. This could be a significant source
> of income for the Gimp Pr
Hello Folks.
I'm a simple user, with some very limited knowledge of software developing but
with some knowledge of management and having read many discussions on OSS and
as a very raw user of Gimp on OS X i would to suggest something to this
discussion list.
I went to the Gimp on Mac site the
