On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 15:22 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> > > >Probably yes, but from what I remember, Shift + Click works in several
> > > >more parts of GIMP's UI. If so, changing it would break consistence.
> > >
> > > I am not sure in what way? Yes, there are other commands that are
> >alte
Martin Nordholts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> If you agree on that, then this improves consistence.
> >
> >I don't agree. First, determining what the "most common use" of a button
> >is, probably is subjective at all. And even if we could determine this
> >in an unambigous way we'd end up basica
On 5/17/06, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>>I understand your point. Our different conclusions is based upon our
>>different definitions of 'consistency'. I think that the UI should be
>>consistend in the effective workflow sense, while you want it to be
>>consistent in a structured way.
>
>I don't bu
> >Probably yes, but from what I remember, Shift + Click works in several
> >more parts of GIMP's UI. If so, changing it would break consistence.
>
> I am not sure in what way? Yes, there are other commands that are
altered
> by Shift. However, the logical relationship between Shift and non-Shift
With my suggestion:
One click and press 'L'
or
Ctrl + Shift + 'N', 'L' (Which btw makes the right hand free to do
whatever
it wants)
It doesn't free the right hand :)
If you want to be picky, then no, the right hand is not free. I meant that
the mouse cursor can do whatever it wants.
I u
