On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:34:19PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > and Gtk is proven to be hard to port to that environment.
> ... but I still fear that porting gimp-perl might be quite a task.
Why? I apart from trivial changes (gimp-perl has to parse the output of
gimptool -
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 01:15:15 +0200, "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2002, at 13:30, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> > Nowadays [...] the majority of GIMP users seem to be
> > Windows users (in contrast with the developers, who are
> > almost exclusively Linux users or UN*X users).
On 19 Apr 2002, at 13:30, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> Nowadays [...] the majority of GIMP users seem to be
> Windows users (in contrast with the developers, who are
> almost exclusively Linux users or UN*X users).
This statement stuck in my mind for some reason. Where do you base
your user estimate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes:
> Unfortunately, the developers who do the windows port don't use the same
> config mechanisms as under unix/cygwin,
Actually, I do. (Hans doesn't.)
> and Gtk is proven to be hard to port to that environment.
... but I still fear that portin
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 02:18:41PM +0200, Branko Collin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For somebody who has never programmed in his/her life, a logical
> language is probably just as easy, if not easier. How many problems
The scheme dialect used in gimp is neither a "logical language", nor a
real (
On 19 Apr 2002, at 13:30, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 13:00:29 +0200, "Steinar H. Gunderson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 03:17:35AM
> > +0200, Branko Collin wrote:
> > > I guess the easiest way to do that
> > > would be to store the output of
> > > you
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 13:00:29 +0200, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 03:17:35AM +0200, Branko Collin wrote:
> >I guess the easiest way to do that would be to store the output of
> >your program as a script-fu script.
>
> Or Perl-Fu -- I'd guess most pe
On 17 Apr 2002, at 8:55, Jacobs, Tim W wrote:
> I wondering about the feasibility of translating PhotoShop action
> files into scripts for GIMP. I've already written a parser for
> PhotoShop 6.0 action files using the Adobe Photoshop 6.0 file formats
> specification (don't have the spec for earli
