[Gimp-developer] gimp-item-transform-scale vs gimp-drawable-transform-scale
Hello I compiled current git and found gimp-drawable-transform-scale became deprecated although it works. The proposed replacement doesn't take scaling algorithm as a parameter. Is it a way to a user to select scaling algorithm anymore? With respect, Alexander Rabtchevich ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-item-transform-scale vs gimp-drawable-transform-scale
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 11:31 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: Hello I compiled current git and found gimp-drawable-transform-scale became deprecated although it works. The proposed replacement doesn't take scaling algorithm as a parameter. Is it a way to a user to select scaling algorithm anymore? It's all documented. regards, --mitch ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-item-transform-scale vs gimp-drawable-transform-scale
Michael Natterer wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 11:31 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: Hello I compiled current git and found gimp-drawable-transform-scale became deprecated although it works. The proposed replacement doesn't take scaling algorithm as a parameter. Is it a way to a user to select scaling algorithm anymore? It's all documented. regards, --mitch Sorry, but procedure browser only says: This procedure scales the specified item. If a selection exists and the item is a drawable, the portion of the drawable which lies under the selection is cut from the drawable and made into a floating selection which is then scaled by the specified amount. The return value is the ID of the scaled item. If there was no selection or the item is not a drawable, this will be equal to the item ID supplied as input. Otherwise, this will be the newly created and scaled drawable. With respect, Alexander Rabtchevich ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-item-transform-scale vs gimp-drawable-transform-scale
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 13:26 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: Michael Natterer wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 11:31 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: Hello I compiled current git and found gimp-drawable-transform-scale became deprecated although it works. The proposed replacement doesn't take scaling algorithm as a parameter. Is it a way to a user to select scaling algorithm anymore? It's all documented. regards, --mitch Sorry, but procedure browser only says: This procedure scales the specified item. If a selection exists and the item is a drawable, the portion of the drawable which lies under the selection is cut from the drawable and made into a floating selection which is then scaled by the specified amount. The return value is the ID of the scaled item. If there was no selection or the item is not a drawable, this will be equal to the item ID supplied as input. Otherwise, this will be the newly created and scaled drawable. I apologize, you are right. I apparently only added links to the new context functions from the new selection API. It's the new context API, e.g. gimp_context_set_interpolation(). Will add the docs after work today. sorry, --mitch ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-item-transform-scale vs gimp-drawable-transform-scale
On 02/11/2011 01:02 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: I apologize, you are right. I apparently only added links to the new context functions from the new selection API. It's the new context API, e.g. gimp_context_set_interpolation(). Will add the docs after work today. Hmmm. What proportion of existing plug-ins working in 2.6 will have to be rewritten for 2.8? In my neck of the IT woods, within the same version backward compatibility is implied... And if a rewrite is necessary we will have to support both versions for quite some time (some people fall in love with some plug-ins and won't upgrade Gimp until there is a new version of their beloved plug-in). And do it again when 3.0 shows up... ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-item-transform-scale vs gimp-drawable-transform-scale
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Ofnuts ofn...@laposte.net wrote: On 02/11/2011 01:02 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: I apologize, you are right. I apparently only added links to the new context functions from the new selection API. It's the new context API, e.g. gimp_context_set_interpolation(). Will add the docs after work today. Hmmm. What proportion of existing plug-ins working in 2.6 will have to be rewritten for 2.8? In my neck of the IT woods, within the same version backward compatibility is implied... And if a rewrite is necessary we will have to support both versions for quite some time (some people fall in love with some plug-ins and won't upgrade Gimp until there is a new version of their beloved plug-in). And do it again when 3.0 shows up... Most existing plug-ins will just work in gimp 2.8 - at least in non-layer group using images (and most plug-ins don't care about more than the current layer/drawable, so these will work anyway, just not on the group, but on individual layers). The fact that some procedures are marked as deprecated does not mean they will stop working in gimp-2.8: they are still there. New plug-ins are however expected not to use these calls (an expectation that is strongly enforced by the fact that the deprecated procedures have their documentation replaced by a stub) When the time comes to GIMP 3.0, that is another history - - chanigng in the major version number also means it is time to break backwards compatibility, and remove deprecated functions. But that is not the case for 2.8. js -- ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-item-transform-scale vs gimp-drawable-transform-scale
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Ofnuts ofn...@laposte.net wrote: On 02/11/2011 01:02 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: I apologize, you are right. I apparently only added links to the new context functions from the new selection API. It's the new context API, e.g. gimp_context_set_interpolation(). Will add the docs after work today. Hmmm. What proportion of existing plug-ins working in 2.6 will have to be rewritten for 2.8? In my neck of the IT woods, within the same version backward compatibility is implied... And if a rewrite is necessary we will have to support both versions for quite some time (some people fall in love with some plug-ins and won't upgrade Gimp until there is a new version of their beloved plug-in). And do it again when 3.0 shows up... But the rewriting needed for 3.0, porting to be GEGL ops, can be done already now, and I would strongly encourage GIMP to make use of GEGL ops more on an equal footing to GIMP plug-ins (and not be hidden in an own menu under the GEGL tool like it is now) so that freshly developed plug-ins can be done as GEGL ops already now and be more future proof. /Øyvind K. -- «The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed» -- William Gibson http://pippin.gimp.org/ http://gegl.org/contribute.html ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-item-transform-scale vs gimp-drawable-transform-scale
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 14:02 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: No needs to apologize, it's a work in progress Another question here - is there a plugin conversion guide somewhere? I tried to run wavelet-sharpen plugin, compiled for 2.7, but it fails with 2 messages: Could not execute plug-in wavelet-sharpen (/opt/gimp-2.7/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/wavelet-sharpen) because it uses an obsolete version of the plug-in protocol. All plugins are binary-compatible within the 2.x series, the error you are seeing is because your plugin still links to an old libgimp version installed somewhere, and libgimp and the gimp app can only work together within one protocol version. Make sure your plugins find the right libgimp and everything will be fine. ciao, --mitch ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-item-transform-scale vs gimp-drawable-transform-scale
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 14:02 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: No needs to apologize, it's a work in progress Another question here - is there a plugin conversion guide somewhere? And no, the new API is still in flux, but there will be an undeprecation guide for 2.8 ciao, --mitch ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-item-transform-scale vs gimp-drawable-transform-scale
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Øyvind Kolås pip...@gimp.org wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Ofnuts ofn...@laposte.net wrote: On 02/11/2011 01:02 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: I apologize, you are right. I apparently only added links to the new context functions from the new selection API. It's the new context API, e.g. gimp_context_set_interpolation(). Will add the docs after work today. Hmmm. What proportion of existing plug-ins working in 2.6 will have to be rewritten for 2.8? In my neck of the IT woods, within the same version backward compatibility is implied... And if a rewrite is necessary we will have to support both versions for quite some time (some people fall in love with some plug-ins and won't upgrade Gimp until there is a new version of their beloved plug-in). And do it again when 3.0 shows up... But the rewriting needed for 3.0, porting to be GEGL ops, can be done already now, and I would strongly encourage GIMP to make use of GEGL ops more on an equal footing to GIMP plug-ins (and not be hidden in an own menu under the GEGL tool like it is now) so that freshly developed plug-ins can be done as GEGL ops already now and be more future proof. For example, people usually marvel at the GEGL c2g filter - and it is completly hidden under tools-GEGL operations. Maybe it could be somewhat more exposed as an option in Colors-desaturate, or filters-artistic? js -- /Øyvind K. -- «The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed» -- William Gibson http://pippin.gimp.org/ http://gegl.org/contribute.html ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-item-transform-scale vs gimp-drawable-transform-scale
Thank you, making a script with export helped to solve it. Michael Natterer wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 14:02 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: No needs to apologize, it's a work in progress Another question here - is there a plugin conversion guide somewhere? I tried to run wavelet-sharpen plugin, compiled for 2.7, but it fails with 2 messages: Could not execute plug-in wavelet-sharpen (/opt/gimp-2.7/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/wavelet-sharpen) because it uses an obsolete version of the plug-in protocol. All plugins are binary-compatible within the 2.x series, the error you are seeing is because your plugin still links to an old libgimp version installed somewhere, and libgimp and the gimp app can only work together within one protocol version. Make sure your plugins find the right libgimp and everything will be fine. ciao, --mitch With respect, Alexander Rabtchevich ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
