Hi Kevin,
a while ago I wrote to the list with the following questions and I don't
remember to have gotten answers to them. Will you please consider to
answer these questions?
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 07:55 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Of course optimizing the Laplacion solver is still desirable.
In regard to: Re: [Gimp-developer] soc-2006-healing-brush branch merged and...:
Hi Kevin,
a while ago I wrote to the list with the following questions and I don't
remember to have gotten answers to them. Will you please consider to
answer these questions?
My guess is that Kevin isn't
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 10:52 -0500, Tim Mooney wrote:
My guess is that Kevin isn't listening right now, because of the move
and internship he mentioned at the bottom of this email:
https://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2006-August/016152.html
Sorry, I missed that. Thanks
Hi Sven,
Regarding your questions: Of course optimizing the Laplacion solver is still desirable. Have you done any profiling on this yet? Is there a way to benchmark it? A regression test would also be nice to have for this purpose.
At the moment I haven't done any profiling. I haven't thought of
Hi!I'm really glad the the Healing Brush has been merged into HEAD. That marks my first open-source contribution!
(1) It would be nice if Jimmac could have a look at redoing the icon. Ivery much like the metaphor but the icon would benefit from some Tangolove applied to it.Yes. Please fix the
Hi,
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 10:41:20 -0400
Von: Kevin Sookocheff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [Gimp-developer] soc-2006-healing-brush branch merged and closed
I created a tutorial about the tool. Is there any GIMP hosted
