On Mon, 29 May 2000, Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 06:46:43PM -0400, Warren Hedley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Also, configure ignores the perl executable argument specified
in the --enable-perl option (see configure line above, for example),
The
../libtool: line 582: syntax error near unexpected
token `|*]*)'
../libtool: line 582: `
*[\[\~\#\^\\*\(\)\{\}\|\;\\\?\'\ \ ]*|*]*)'
make[2]: *** [gimp.lo] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/pixel/stuff/gimp-1.1.23/libgimp'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving
Well, it looks like I will not be able to attend the GIMP Developers
Conference at the end of this week (too bad - I really wanted to be
there), so here is an idea that could be discussed: there could be an
option to rotate a brush automatically according to the local tangent
of the path that the
Raphael:
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 02:28:33PM +0200, Raphael Quinet wrote:
Well, it looks like I will not be able to attend the GIMP Developers
Conference at the end of this week (too bad - I really wanted to be
there), so here is an idea that could be discussed: there could be
an option to
Marc Lehmann wrote:
The --enable-perl option specifies the perl prefix to install the
pelr modules, not the perl executable path. Specifying a file will be
disastrous.
Doh. OK - I didn't read that very closely.
I think that the option should be named "--enable-perl-prefix" ...
If someone
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 09:03:11AM -0400, Tom Rathborne wrote:
Raphael:
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 02:28:33PM +0200, Raphael Quinet wrote:
Well, it looks like I will not be able to attend the GIMP Developers
Conference at the end of this week (too bad - I really wanted to be
there), so
On Sun, 28 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
i want to update my gtk 1.2.7 to 1.2.8. Does Gimp 1.1.22 running with
it, or should i wait until a newer version?
Gtk+ is -- inside a major release -- binary compatible (upwards) --
programs compiled with gtk+-1.2.x will work with
Hi,
Wouldn't it be good for Gimp, if there would be an external viewer
to watch the files?
Yes and no. He told me that he wouldn't be making the viewer able to
parse xcf files completely, anyway, as that would be too complex. Only
the bottom layer would probably be shown. (This is how
Hago Ziegler wrote:
Hi,
Wouldn't it be good for Gimp, if there would be an external viewer
to watch the files?
Yes and no. He told me that he wouldn't be making the viewer able to
parse xcf files completely, anyway, as that would be too complex. Only
the bottom layer would
