Simon Budig wrote:
>
> I see, that Gimp can be crashed very easily when trying to use multiple
> tools at the same image/layer. Michael adressed this: from the changelog:
>
> [...]
>
> Well - unfortunately this disables "user multitasking" with working
> on multiple images. Admittedly I dont do
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Is there any chance to do this on an "per image" base without
> > hazzeling too much?
>
> It's not only parallel operations on an image. Gimp doesn't like you to
> change the tool while it is active. So you can't rotate an image (using
> the transform
Austin Donnelly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Monday, 27 Mar 2000, Simon Budig wrote:
> > Is there any chance to do this on an "per image" base without
> > hazzeling too much?
>
> I proposed to add per-image locking a while ago, but apparently this
> wasn't too well liked. I'm can't remember w
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 09:34:35PM +0200, Simon Budig wrote:
> I see, that Gimp can be crashed very easily when trying to use multiple
> tools at the same image/layer. Michael adressed this: from the changelog:
>
[ snip ]
>
> Well - unfortunately this disables "user multitasking" with worki
On Monday, 27 Mar 2000, Simon Budig wrote:
> Well - unfortunately this disables "user multitasking" with working
> on multiple images. Admittedly I dont do this too often, but sometimes
> it is nice to paint something while waiting for a big image to
> rotate. (just tested - multiple plugins do w
Hi all.
I see, that Gimp can be crashed very easily when trying to use multiple
tools at the same image/layer. Michael adressed this: from the changelog:
2000-03-25 Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* app/cursorutil.[ch]: new global variable "gimp_busy" which gets
set/unset
