Re: libgimp(ui), iibintl and (l)gpl problems

1999-12-03 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 06:28:42AM +0200, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That depends on exactly what source code you use to build libintl. The > "intl" directory from glibc is LGPL, but the same sources (more or > less) when distributed with gettext are GPL... Whew, I didn't know thi

Re: libgimp(ui), iibintl and (l)gpl problems

1999-12-03 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 2 Dec, Marc Lehmann wrote: > However, if we solve this problem by *linking* libintl against > libgimpui we get another problem: linking against libintl > automatically puts libgimpui under the GPL. If you are using glibc2 then you've got not problem with lgpl, because its LGPL itself then.

libgimp(ui), iibintl and (l)gpl problems

1999-12-02 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Marc Lehmann writes: > However, if we solve this problem by *linking* libintl against libgimpui > we get another problem: linking against libintl automatically puts > libgimpui under the GPL. That depends on exactly what source code you use to build libintl. The "intl" directory from glibc is

libgimp(ui), iibintl and (l)gpl problems

1999-12-02 Thread Marc Lehmann
At the moment, libgimp&gimpui.so are not linked against libintl, which means they break on machines without gettext & friends in the libc. However, if we solve this problem by *linking* libintl against libgimpui we get another problem: linking against libintl automatically puts libgimpui under th