Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Jehan Pagès writes: [on one repo per asset vs. one repo containing many assets] > Really I don't understand this point which Akkana is raising. Has > anyone ever made plugins for various software? I have, for a bunch, > many dead now, some still living. And never have I ever thought "oh > let's

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

> > I'm sure if they require something other than sRGB, they will want >> Photoshop (at the moment). >> Of course, that is a self-imposed limitation. Suggesting that >> professional results can only be gotten outside sRGB is untrue. >> > > "Professional results" and "self-imposed limitation" are

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

On 04/04/2016 01:54 PM, C R wrote: On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Elle Stone > wrote: Putting the serious limitations of 8-bit editing to one side, even high bit depth GIMP 2.9/2.10 lacks critically important

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Hi, Just giving a few answers. I really can't make the time right now and I think we will have to discuss this with voice, because it looks like several things I say are really not understandable (well they are by me, but my English may be lacking! At least I have to say the same thing again).

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

I will say that it would be nice to have a recommended hardware to run GIMP. I know this is Free and Open Source Software and you can pretty much run it one anything as well as we are not Photoshop and are not worried about sails and making sure that the customer is running the best hardware to

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

On 04/04/2016 12:28 PM, Øyvind Kolås wrote: One of the primary reason some of us have has as motivation for working on GEGL and its integration in GIMP for more than a decade is not high bit depth support, but non-destructive editing features like "adjustment layers" and "smart objects". As has

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

I am sorry for perhaps causing any confusion or misunderstandings :(. I suck at conveying information. Let me try a slightly different approach that coincides with my thought process... We are really approaching two things that are related in this discussion. 1. Registry Replacement 2. GIMP

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Partha Bagchi wrote: > Also, I would think that nondestructive > editing would be high on the list (Photoshop's "Smart Objects"). > > If I am not mistaken, Alex has already mentioned adjustment layers numerous > times in past as a

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

I'm writing up a response (with pictures and everything!) in a hope to clarify some of the things... :) On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:50 AM Kevin Payne wrote: > At the risk of putting words into Pat's mouth, wasn't he referring to them > as assets? > > Kevin > > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

At the risk of putting words into Pat's mouth, wasn't he referring to them as assets? Kevin From: gimp-developer-list on behalf of Jehan Pagès Sent: 04 April 2016 15:19 To: Michael

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote: >> Gesendet: Montag, 04. April 2016 um 15:48 Uhr >> Von: "Jehan Pagès" > >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote: > >> > I am also still puzzled how the

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

Totally agree with you. Color management would definitely be a priority for high-end photo editing software. Also, I would think that nondestructive editing would be high on the list (Photoshop's "Smart Objects"). If I am not mistaken, Alex has already mentioned adjustment layers numerous times

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

> Gesendet: Montag, 04. April 2016 um 15:48 Uhr > Von: "Jehan Pagès" > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote: > > I am also still puzzled how the "one repository per 'script/plugin'" (we > > really need a better term for that

Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestions

On 03/27/2016 02:44 PM, C R wrote: I've found that anything else would be a waste of (everyone's) time. For some, nothing but Photoshop will work for their graphics needs. It's no use arguing with them, because they have already made up their mind, and it's more important to think they are

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Hi, On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote: >> Gesendet: Montag, 04. April 2016 um 12:03 Uhr >> Von: "Jehan Pagès" > >> When I read this, I understand that I am really not clear. > >> So no, I am not saying and have never said that

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

> Gesendet: Montag, 04. April 2016 um 12:03 Uhr > Von: "Jehan Pagès" > When I read this, I understand that I am really not clear. > So no, I am not saying and have never said that we would grab > repository from "elsewhere". I know patdavid seemed to have such an >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Hi, On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Akkana Peck wrote: > Just agreeing with a few of Ofnuts' points: > > Ofnuts writes: >> Author: >> - communications with users: forum, etc. Mail notification necessary > > +1. With the current setup, I remember going to a page I'd made

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Hi, On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Akkana Peck wrote: > Andrew Toskin writes: >> > On 2016-04-01 13:32, Pat David wrote: >> > Jehan suggested that each script/plugin/asset have it's own git repo. >> > This would be handy, particularly if script authors did this as well

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP crashes at changing of theme

I too had to change the light theme icons right away for lack of visibility. Maybe the "symbolic inverted" icon theme should be the default active. Then only the mid-tone theme(s) have visibility issues. :) My 2p. -C On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote: >

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP crashes at changing of theme

On April 4, 2016 2:16:49 AM GMT+02:00, Akkana Peck wrote: >Alexander Rabtchevich writes: >> Grey icons from small theme become undistinguishable to me - they do >not >> have enough contrast between background and image. > >Kevin Payne writes: >> Can you be more specific