Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Hi, For info, I wrote a "bit" of text after the meeting. It's somewhere in my hard drive, I'll have to look for it. I will publish things on the wiki so that we can discuss and collaborate on a spec. Jehan On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Pat David wrote: > Just a quick

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Just a quick note for everyone (that either didn't attend LGM or didn't hear the results of the conversation I had with Joao and Jehan)... After some back and forth we are currently considering managing our own infrastructure to host plugins/scripts. We had a chance to speak (loudly in my case)

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Akkana Peck wrote: > I'm still not clear what the advantage would be of one repo per > file. Not to kick a week-old hornet's nest, but I'd like to point out that as a user looking for extensions/add-ons/scripts/etc, I find it much more convenient to download/clone a

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Hi, I said I would not answer anymore, but I will (hopefully a last time) because I am weak and can't control my fingers! :P Anyway this discussion is very frustrating because my emails are not fully read. I'm sorry to say so Akkana, but your answer below is either off-topic, or actually going in

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Jehan Pagès writes: [on one repo per asset vs. one repo containing many assets] > Really I don't understand this point which Akkana is raising. Has > anyone ever made plugins for various software? I have, for a bunch, > many dead now, some still living. And never have I ever thought "oh > let's

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Hi, Just giving a few answers. I really can't make the time right now and I think we will have to discuss this with voice, because it looks like several things I say are really not understandable (well they are by me, but my English may be lacking! At least I have to say the same thing again).

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

I am sorry for perhaps causing any confusion or misunderstandings :(. I suck at conveying information. Let me try a slightly different approach that coincides with my thought process... We are really approaching two things that are related in this discussion. 1. Registry Replacement 2. GIMP

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

s? > > Kevin > > > > From: gimp-developer-list <gimp-developer-list-boun...@gnome.org> on > behalf of Jehan Pagès <jehan.marmott...@gmail.com> > Sent: 04 April 2016 15:19 > To: Michael Schumacher > Cc: gimp-web-list; GIMP Developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

To: Michael Schumacher Cc: gimp-web-list; GIMP Developer List Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Michael Schumacher <schum...@gmx.de> wrote: >> Gesendet: Montag, 04. April 2016 um 15:48

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote: >> Gesendet: Montag, 04. April 2016 um 15:48 Uhr >> Von: "Jehan Pagès" > >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote: > >> > I am also still puzzled how the

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

> Gesendet: Montag, 04. April 2016 um 15:48 Uhr > Von: "Jehan Pagès" > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote: > > I am also still puzzled how the "one repository per 'script/plugin'" (we > > really need a better term for that

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Hi, On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote: >> Gesendet: Montag, 04. April 2016 um 12:03 Uhr >> Von: "Jehan Pagès" > >> When I read this, I understand that I am really not clear. > >> So no, I am not saying and have never said that

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

> Gesendet: Montag, 04. April 2016 um 12:03 Uhr > Von: "Jehan Pagès" > When I read this, I understand that I am really not clear. > So no, I am not saying and have never said that we would grab > repository from "elsewhere". I know patdavid seemed to have such an >

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Hi, On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Akkana Peck wrote: > Andrew Toskin writes: >> > On 2016-04-01 13:32, Pat David wrote: >> > Jehan suggested that each script/plugin/asset have it's own git repo. >> > This would be handy, particularly if script authors did this as well

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-web] Gitlab as a replacement for registry.gimp.org

Andrew Toskin writes: > > On 2016-04-01 13:32, Pat David wrote: > > Jehan suggested that each script/plugin/asset have it's own git repo. > > This would be handy, particularly if script authors did this as well (as it > > considerably eases the inclusion of external repos as submodules). > >