[Gimp-developer] Gimp binary size

2003-01-28 Thread Owen
I apologize for this question The Gimp 1.2 I have is 2113804 bytes, it came with the MDK 9 distro The Gimp 1.3.11 was 3597994 bytes, officially released 1.3.11 A recent Gimp 1.3.12 was 38551604 from one of the CVS repositories Why are the binaries of the 1.3 series 15 times the size of 1.2 ?

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp binary size

2003-01-28 Thread Tino Schwarze
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:36:26AM +, Owen wrote: > I apologize for this question > > The Gimp 1.2 I have is 2113804 bytes, it came with the MDK 9 distro > The Gimp 1.3.11 was 3597994 bytes, officially released 1.3.11 > A recent Gimp 1.3.12 was 38551604 from one of the CVS repositories > > W

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp binary size

2003-01-28 Thread Michael Natterer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze) writes: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:36:26AM +, Owen wrote: > > I apologize for this question > > > > The Gimp 1.2 I have is 2113804 bytes, it came with the MDK 9 distro > > The Gimp 1.3.11 was 3597994 bytes, officially released 1.3.11 > > A recent Gimp 1.3.

Re: [Gimp-developer] sourceforge cvs issue

2003-01-28 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 01:15:07 +, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Branko Collin writes: > > Is not all your code in the GIMP CVS repository? If so, why not? > > I have told this several times, most recently earlier today: > > I have local changes I haven't committed to the (real)

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp binary size

2003-01-28 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, that's exactly the reason for the insane size. You probably use > gcc 3.2?? I noticed the same some days ago. this is not related to the gcc version but to the default cflags. as for now, most packages come with -g or -g -O2 as default cflags du

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp binary size

2003-01-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I apologize for this question > > The Gimp 1.2 I have is 2113804 bytes, it came with the MDK 9 distro > The Gimp 1.3.11 was 3597994 bytes, officially released 1.3.11 > A recent Gimp 1.3.12 was 38551604 from one of the CVS repositories > > Why are the bina

Re: [Gimp-developer] sourceforge cvs issue

2003-01-28 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Raphaël Quinet writes: > From my point of view, I think that it would be better to integrate > these changes before the 1.2.4 release. It's just that maybe half of the changes are really quite ugly hacks to get non-ASCII file and directory names working somewhat better on Windows, where GTK+ 1

Re: [Gimp-developer] sourceforge cvs issue

2003-01-28 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:38:28 +, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raphaël Quinet writes: > > From my point of view, I think that it would be better to integrate > > these changes before the 1.2.4 release. > > It's just that maybe half of the changes are really quite ugly hacks > t

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp binary size

2003-01-28 Thread Owen
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:01:29 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze) wrote: > > A recent Gimp 1.3.12 was 38551604 from one of the CVS repositories > > > > Why are the binaries of the 1.3 series 15 times the size of 1.2 ? > > Wild guess: They probably still have the debug info attached. Try > u

Re: [Gimp-developer] sourceforge cvs issue

2003-01-28 Thread Patrick McFarland
Tor, sf.net wont remove the wingimp project until you, or any other qualified gimp developer tells them to. The project is already breaking atleast one rule, the one about only developers for a project can start a sf.net project about the said project. Please take care of this before it gets out o