[Gimp-developer] something for you

2004-02-21 Thread collin
take it easy <> ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Gimp-developer] warning

2004-02-21 Thread jernej . simoncic
read the details. <> ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Gimp-developer] hello

2004-02-21 Thread sven
here <> ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Gimp-developer] virus issue on the gimp-developer mailing list

2004-02-21 Thread Mat Caughron
Hi all: I'm not the list administrator, but I'd like to urge the following gimp-developers to closely examine their emailing workstations for viruses. Thanks, Mat Caughron Feb 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED](33K) [Gimp-developer] hello Feb 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED](33K) [Gimp-developer] sto

[Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp-developer Digest, Vol 17, Issue 39

2004-02-21 Thread Juhana Sadeharju
Hello. I'm getting spam like this. Many times per day. Sven and Austin, say what, somebody is using your names; why don't you go and file these cases to police? In otherhand if you agree with the spammer by doing nothing, then you're part of the spamming. Regards, Juhana Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 1

Re : [Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp-developer Digest, Vol 17, Issue 39

2004-02-21 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Le 21.02.2004 17:57, Juhana Sadeharju a écrit : Hello. I'm getting spam like this. Many times per day. Sven and Austin, say what, somebody is using your names; why don't you go and file these cases to police? In otherhand if you agree with the spammer by doing nothing, then you're part of the spamm

[Gimp-developer] Re: virus issue on the gimp-developer mailing list

2004-02-21 Thread GSR - FR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-02-21 at 1037.10 -0600): > I'm not the list administrator, but I'd like to urge the > following gimp-developers to closely examine their emailing workstations > for viruses. The most probable explanation is faked origin. Just inspect the headers to see clear differences. Vi

Re: [Gimp-developer] virus issue on the gimp-developer mailing list

2004-02-21 Thread Branko Collin
On 21 Feb 2004, at 10:37, Mat Caughron wrote: > I'm not the list administrator, but I'd like to urge the > following gimp-developers to closely examine their emailing > workstations for viruses. Why would these developers have viruses? -- branko collin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp-developer Digest, Vol 17, Issue 39

2004-02-21 Thread Branko Collin
On 21 Feb 2004, at 18:57, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: > Hello. I'm getting spam like this. Many times per day. > Sven and Austin, say what, somebody is using your names; > why don't you go and file these cases to police? > In otherhand if you agree with the spammer by doing > nothing, then you're part

[Gimp-developer] something for you

2004-02-21 Thread jernej . simoncic
do you? <> ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp-developer Digest, Vol 17, Issue 39

2004-02-21 Thread Kevin Myers
Juhana, you are wrong. I subscribe and post to multiple public lists, and as an unfortunate result get literally hundreds of spam emails like these per day, virtually all of them from faked email addresses. I wouldn't be at all surprised Sven and Jernej are in the same predicament given their fre

Re: [Gimp-developer] virus issue on the gimp-developer mailing list

2004-02-21 Thread Kevin Myers
Mat, I'm sorry, but you obviously don't know enough about this problem to be posting this kind of message. I can assure you that Sven, Jernej, and the other developers on this list know a lot more about this problem than you appear to, and the problem is *NOT* on their machines. If you had done m

Re: [Gimp-developer] virus issue on the gimp-developer mailing list

2004-02-21 Thread David Neary
Hi Kevin, Kevin Myers wrote: > In any case, please be more careful to put proper blame where it belongs > before posting future notes of this type. There was really no need to post this message. That this is a virus issue is clear, and has been made clear by other posts (including one by you). As

[Gimp-developer] about spam

2004-02-21 Thread Juhana Sadeharju
>From: "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On 21 Feb 2004, at 18:57, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: > >> Hello. I'm getting spam like this. Many times per day. >> Sven and Austin, say what, somebody is using your names; >> why don't you go and file these cases to police? >> In otherhand if you agree wi

Re: [Gimp-developer] about spam

2004-02-21 Thread Branko Collin
On 21 Feb 2004, at 22:04, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: > >From: "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On 21 Feb 2004, at 18:57, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: > > > >> Hello. I'm getting spam like this. Many times per day. > >> Sven and Austin, say what, somebody is using your names; > >> why don't you go and

Re: [Gimp-developer] about spam

2004-02-21 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Juhana Sadeharju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:04:11 +0200 You don't know? There could be many. Using somebody else's name and address is one, that is up to Sven and others to decide what they do about it. There's nothing at all that Sven can do about it. So

Re: [Gimp-developer] about spam

2004-02-21 Thread Henning Nielsen Lund
I'm leaving this list for now :-( Hope they have solved this problem by the next time I will join this list again ... Best regards, hnl_dk - Henning Nielsen Lund ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/l

[Gimp-developer] warning

2004-02-21 Thread jernej . simoncic
that's funny <> ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] virus issue on the gimp-developer mailing list

2004-02-21 Thread Mat Caughron
Hi Kevin: Intention wasn't to give blame or point fingers. I am by no means an expert in email viruses/spam issues but wanted to make sure that the topic got brought up (for all I knew those developers weren't getting the emails and therefore weren't aware of something that they should be and I