Hi,
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > After all, I think this API change is best committed atomically,
> > so I'll just continue hacking the plug-ins and commit everything
> > today or tomorrow.
>
> If you think you'll be done that quickly, that's perhaps best.
>From looking over Mitc
Michael Natterer wrote:
> David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Would this be worthwhile? I would certainly do a few plug-ins,
> > are there others who would be able to help out here?
>
> While there is certainly help needed (my fingers start to break when
> i try to type 'GTK_RESPONSE_FOO'
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One question... do you think it would be worthwhile to make the
> API change, document what needs to be done to change from the old
> API to the new, and then have a number of people work on porting
> the plug-ins? Each plug-in in itself would probably be
Hi Mitch,
Michael Natterer wrote:
> GtkWidget *
> gimp_dialog_new (const gchar*title,
> const gchar*role,
> GtkWidget *parent,
> GtkDialogFlags flags,
> GimpHelpFunchelp_func,
> const gchar
Hi,
As you may know, GimpDialog from libgimpwidgets badly needs an
API change for GIMP 2.0.
The relevant bugzilla entry:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125143
The plan is to just remove our own action_area API and use GtkDialog's
one, which involves making use of the dialog's "respons
