On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:52:08AM +0200, David Neary wrote:
> I don't think there should be a % in the list of clobbered registers. What's
> worse, I don't even think most versions of gcc know about MMX registers at
> all (I might be mistaken, th
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:13:29PM +0200, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I don't think there should be a % in the list of clobbered registers.
yupp, there is no %mm1 register :)
> worse, I don't even think most versions of gcc know about MMX registers at
versions 2.x (usual
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:52:08AM +0200, David Neary wrote:
> asm("movq %0, %%mm1"
> :
> : "m"(rgba8_alpha_mask)
> : "%mm1");
>
> breaks on the second %mm1;
I don't think there should be a % in the list of clobbered registers. What's
worse, I don't even think most versions of gcc kn
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 01:17:49PM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> __asm__ __volatile__ ()
>
> while the new code in The GIMP seems to be using
>
> asm()
>
> I don't know this stuff good enough to know the difference, but I'd
__keyword__-style keywords are always there, eve
David Neary wrote:
> It seems that the thing which is annoying my compiler
> is teh doubling of the % signs - with one % all passes well, with
> two, not so well. A sligntly modified configure confirms this.
>
> Are the two %s necessary to prefix the mm registers?
This is, of course, nonesense.
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> could you please test the attached diff to configure.in. It should
> find the problem with your compiler and it even simplifies things a
> bit.
I have stried, and my computer passes the mmx test with flying
colours :) It seems that the thing which is annoying
Hi,
Helvetix Victorinox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This isn't quite ready to go yet. But thanks for the note. The
> default build behaviour right now is to not build the new code.
Please, if possible, let the code be build. We need as much testing as
possible and we lack experience with bui
This isn't quite ready to go yet. But thanks for the note. The default
build behaviour right now is to not build the new code.
Helvetix
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 08:36:44AM +0200, David Neary wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The new MMX composite code in the 1.3 tree doesn't build for me -
> am I the only o
Hi David,
could you please test the attached diff to configure.in. It should
find the problem with your compiler and it even simplifies things a
bit.
Sven
Index: configure.in
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gimp/configure.in,v
retrieving
Hi,
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The new code is missing a #ifdef somewhere, I think - perhaps
> composite-mmx.c shouldn't be build at all if USE_MMX isn't
> defined... but that's another issue.
I've added an #ifdef that causes the file content to be skipped. I
prefer #ifdefs over a
Hi,
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That said, some day soon, the GIMP developers are going to have
> to get together for a brainstorning session about how we can
> communicate better with the user base, and vice versa. With IRC,
> Bugzilla, 2 mailing lists, usenet, the [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
indeed there was an #ifdef missing. My latest commit should fix the
build for you. Can you please check config.log nevertheless since I'd
like to make sure that the configure check did it's job correctly.
These new checks could need some more testing. So if you are on an
obscure hardware-plat
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The new MMX composite code in the 1.3 tree doesn't build for me -
> > am I the only one? My processor is a 350MHz K6-2 with mmx
> > support, and the error says that there are a bunch (6, I think)
> > of unknown registers
Hi,
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The new MMX composite code in the 1.3 tree doesn't build for me -
> am I the only one? My processor is a 350MHz K6-2 with mmx
> support, and the error says that there are a bunch (6, I think)
> of unknown registers in the asm (%mm0, %mm1, ...).
The c
Hi,
The new MMX composite code in the 1.3 tree doesn't build for me -
am I the only one? My processor is a 350MHz K6-2 with mmx
support, and the error says that there are a bunch (6, I think)
of unknown registers in the asm (%mm0, %mm1, ...).
I'm mailing this to the list because, to be quite hon
15 matches
Mail list logo
