Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] http://layers.gimp.org/ is Ugly

2006-08-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 19:09 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > Then there is no sense in naming the planet "layers" anymore. I agree > that implementation could be better, though I can even imagine how > exactly within current approach). There has never been a good reason to call it "layer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] http://layers.gimp.org/ is Ugly

2006-08-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 13:34 +0200, Roman Joost wrote: > Besides the technical problems, I think you should propose a new site > layout than just pestering about the current layout. That's of course correct but Shlomi has a point here. The pages that he mentioned look vastly different than th

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] http://layers.gimp.org/ is Ugly

2006-08-29 Thread William Skaggs
From: Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I'm afraid to say that http://layers.gimp.org/ is incredibly ugly, and makes >us look very bad. As people who develop an image editing software we should >have at least a bit of rudimentary aesthetic sense. If this were a bug report, the first thing we wo

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] http://layers.gimp.org/ is Ugly

2006-08-29 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 8/29/06, Shlomi Fish wrote: Well, we can use any of the following designs, which are much better: * http://www.planetapache.org/ * http://advogato.ev-en.org/ * http://planet.gnome.org/ * http://planetsun.org/ I recall seeing even better looking planets in my neverending web surfing. Plus

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] http://layers.gimp.org/ is Ugly

2006-08-29 Thread Marco Wessel
On Aug 29, 2006, at 3:58 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote: Well, we can use any of the following designs, which are much better: * http://www.planetapache.org/ * http://advogato.ev-en.org/ * http://planet.gnome.org/ * http://planetsun.org/ I recall seeing even better looking planets in my neverending

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] http://layers.gimp.org/ is Ugly

2006-08-29 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 14:34, Roman Joost wrote: > Hi folks, > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 12:30:59PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > I'm afraid to say that http://layers.gimp.org/ is incredibly ugly, and > > makes us look very bad. As people who develop an image editing software > > we should have

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] http://layers.gimp.org/ is Ugly

2006-08-29 Thread Roman Joost
Hi folks, On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 12:30:59PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > I'm afraid to say that http://layers.gimp.org/ is incredibly ugly, and makes > us look very bad. As people who develop an image editing software we should > have at least a bit of rudimentary aesthetic sense. > > Carol tol

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] http://layers.gimp.org/ is Ugly

2006-08-29 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 13:07, Carol Spears wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 12:30:59PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > Please fix all that. > > do you want me to remove your feed from that planet instance? > Carol, I already told you on the IRC that I don't want such a thing. I don't want the GI