On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 19:09 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

> Then there is no sense in naming the planet "layers" anymore. I agree
> that implementation could be better, though I can even imagine how
> exactly within current approach).

There has never been a good reason to call it "layers". The naming and
design has also never been discussed here or on the gimp-web list. It
just happened to be done. Which is often good. In this particular case
though, I don't think that the result is very useful.


Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to