Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP and Google SoC (from digest)

2006-04-21 Thread Nathan Summers
On 4/19/06, GSR - FR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-04-19 at 1158.08 +0200): How is this fairly straightforward with the current architecture? I would rather say that it is currently almost impossible to implement sanely. Ah, but I'm insane. Add a layer type

[Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP and Google SoC (from digest)

2006-04-19 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Michael Schumacher wrote: Von: Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all, I have registered the GIMP as a mentoring organisation for the Summer of Code (I had been in contact with Google before the announcement), we should be up on the page over the next couple of days. It would

[Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP and Google SoC (from digest)

2006-04-19 Thread GSR - FR
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-04-19 at 1158.08 +0200): How is this fairly straightforward with the current architecture? I would rather say that it is currently almost impossible to implement sanely. Ah, but I'm insane. Add a layer type for effect layers, and define 3 operations that you can

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP and Google SoC

2006-04-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd love to see a single unified interface shared by the various Python-fu, Script-fu, Perl-fu etc and it might make a suitable project since it is a limited self contained task. Can you elaborate on this? Single unified interface sounds great but I

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP and Google SoC

2006-04-19 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Sven Neumann wrote: Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:02:47 +0200 From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Not Photoshop gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP and Google SoC Hi, Alan Horkan [EMAIL

[Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP and Google SoC

2006-04-18 Thread GSR - FR
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-04-18 at 1004.27 +0200): I had some ideas: - Scripting languages and the GIMP - work on ruby or python bindings What is missing in python one? About more langs... well, it is nice, but it is also nice to have things that are completly finished instead of many half