Re: [Gimp-developer] gegl babl trouble
Hi, On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 08:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just pulled a clean svn gimp and wanted to build with > --prefix=/usr/local , I supplied this arguement to autogen.sh and it > output both that prefix and --prefix=/opt/gimp , which I presume is the > new default. Definitely not. The default prefix is, and has always been, /usr/local. > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > checking for BABL... configure: error: Package requirements (babl >= > 0.0.22) were not met: > > No package 'babl' found Have you adjusted PKG_CONFIG_PATH ? > BTW INSTALL says to run ./configure which does not exist, should this be > corrected to say autogen.sh ? INSTALL has the instructions for building from a tarball. When building from SVN some extra steps are necessary. If you have build problems, perhaps it would be a good idea to use the babl and GEGL release tarballs instead of SVN checkouts. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gegl babl trouble
Hello, On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 4:12 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just pulled a clean svn gimp and wanted to build with > --prefix=/usr/local , I supplied this arguement to autogen.sh and it > output both that prefix and --prefix=/opt/gimp , which I presume is the > new default. ... No. Something is wrong. Gimp does not specify any such thing. In fact, I always had the impression that for SVN versions, prefix defaulted to /usr/local. This may actually be a problem with your autotools. I can verify that mine accept my chosen prefix (/usr) without saying anything more, I'm running autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.61 automake 1.10 or 1.7 (yes, both.. normally programs use 1.10, some need 1.7) on an installation of Ubuntu Hardy Heron. What versions are you running (automake --version / autoconf --version) on what distribution? > > I had the same behaviour from babl , although it did install where I > requested > > bash-3.2#ls /usr/local/lib > babl-0.0 libbabl-0.0.la libbabl-0.0.so.0 pkgconfig > fpc libbabl-0.0.so libbabl-0.0.so.0.23.0 X11 > > > However, now I try to build gegl it can't find babl: > > > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > checking for BABL... configure: error: Package requirements (babl >= > 0.0.22) were not met: > > No package 'babl' found > > > Why can't it see a correctly installed babl? /usr/local/bin is in $PATH. ... Does the binary directory have anything to do with it? After all, babl installs no binaries, only libraries (ie /usr/local/lib/) > BTW INSTALL says to run ./configure which does not exist, should this be > corrected to say autogen.sh ? configure exists for releases -- it's generated by autogen.sh. This is normal for autotools-based software building. Hope that helped, David ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] gegl babl trouble
Hi, I just pulled a clean svn gimp and wanted to build with --prefix=/usr/local , I supplied this arguement to autogen.sh and it output both that prefix and --prefix=/opt/gimp , which I presume is the new default. I had the same behaviour from babl , although it did install where I requested bash-3.2#ls /usr/local/lib babl-0.0 libbabl-0.0.la libbabl-0.0.so.0 pkgconfig fpc libbabl-0.0.so libbabl-0.0.so.0.23.0 X11 However, now I try to build gegl it can't find babl: checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for BABL... configure: error: Package requirements (babl >= 0.0.22) were not met: No package 'babl' found Why can't it see a correctly installed babl? /usr/local/bin is in $PATH. Thanks. BTW INSTALL says to run ./configure which does not exist, should this be corrected to say autogen.sh ? -- .*. /V\ (/ \) ( ) ^^_^^ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
